Back in June I complained about what I called Democrats' strange obsession with tricking Republicans into voting for tax hikes. It's no secret that Democrats favor more tax revenue. And lucky for them, taxes are scheduled to go up automatically in January to a level that's higher than Democrats themselves favor. So all Democrats need to do is let taxes go up in January, and then propose to bring them back down somewhat. But instead the party has invested tons of effort during the Obama years into trying to get Republicans to cast an affirmative vote in favor of higher taxes.
I got a ton of immediate pushback from folks in Congress about that, explaining that it was all very complicated and groundwork was being laid and blah blah blah, and now Jonathan Weisman reports in the New York Times that Democratic senators are coming around to embracing the inevitable:
Senate Democrats—holding firm against extending tax cuts for the rich—are proposing a novel way to circumvent the Republican pledge not to vote for any tax increase: Allow all the tax cuts to expire Jan. 1, then vote on a tax cut for the middle class shortly thereafter.
Now, of course, there's no reason you can't walk and chew gum at the same time. You write two bills. One is called the "Middle Class Tax Cut Extension Act of 2012," and one is called the "Middle Class Tax Cut of 2013." One says the Bush tax will be partially extended; the other says that having expired the Bush tax cuts will be partially reinstated. You hold one in your right hand and the other in your left hand, and you keep trying to get votes on the one through Dec. 31, 2012, and start trying to get votes on the other starting on Jan. 2, 2013. That's a plan that's guaranteed to work if Democrats win the election in November, and obviously nothing's going to work if they lose.
TODAY IN SLATE
Slate Plus Early Read: The Self-Made Man
The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.
Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada. Now, Journalists Can’t Even Say Her Name.
Mitt Romney May Be Weighing a 2016 Run. That Would Be a Big Mistake.
Amazing Photos From Hong Kong’s Umbrella Revolution
Transparent Is the Fall’s Only Great New Show
Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada
Now, journalists can't even say her name.
Lena Dunham, the Book
More shtick than honesty in Not That Kind of Girl.