If I lived in a small community where it wasn't economical to provide schedule airplane service, I would welcome a federal program to subsidize said service to my airport. Then again I would welcome a federal program to put money directly in my pocket even more. Giving a dedicated aviation subsidy doesn't make much sense. If the economy value of subsidized air service exceeded the cost, it would make sense for the town to subsidize it on our own accord. And there's clear no particular federal interest in subsidizing this kind of purely local benefit. If anything, encouraging excessive use of airspace and jet fuel creates "public bads." Subsidizing daily flights from Hagerstown, MD to BWI airport 75 miles away is nice for Hagerstown residents who might otherwise need to drive (or take the bus) there but it doesn't advance any important national goals.
And yet just last night an effort by Rep Tod McClintock (R-CA) to kill the federal Essential Air Service program went down to defeat with 77 Republicans joining 161 Democrats to keep this wasteful program in place. Unfortunately that's how it normally goes with bipartisanship—an issue cuts across party lines precisely because it's some kind of pointless giveaway.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Self-Made Man
The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.
Michigan’s Tradition of Football “Toughness” Needs to Go—Starting With Coach Hoke
Does Your Child Have “Sluggish Cognitive Tempo”? Or Is That Just a Disorder Made Up to Scare You?
The First Case of Ebola in America Has Been Diagnosed in Dallas
Windows 8 Was So Bad That Microsoft Will Skip Straight to Windows 10
Mad About Modi
Why the controversial Indian prime minister drew 19,000 cheering fans to Madison Square Garden.
You Deserve a Pre-cation
The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.