Taxing Dressage Horses Revisited

Moneybox
A blog about business and economics.
June 19 2012 9:12 AM

Clarifying The Record on Mitt Romney's $77,000-Loss Olympic Horse Rafalca

146519524
DUBUQUE, IA - JUNE 18: Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann Romney, during a campaign event aboard the Spirit of Dubuque on June 18, 2012 in Dubuque, Iowa.

Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

A recent New York Times article about Rafalca, Ann Romney's Olympic-quality dressage horse, stated that "the Romneys declared a loss of $77,000 on their 2010 tax returns for the share in the care and feeding of Rafalca, which Mrs. Romney owns with Mr. Ebeling’s wife, Amy, and a family friend, Beth Meyers."

This led me to conclude that Romney obtained a $77,000 deduction for the horse, which, as NYC Southpaw notes, is not yet the case though it may well be in the future.

1340111384114
Advertisement

The way this works is that the Romneys, the Ebelings, and Beth Meyers have together formed a corporate entity called "Rob Rom Enterprises LLC," which owns Rafalca and pays for his upkeep. The Romneys reported $77,731 in "passive losses" related to their investment in Rob Rom Enterprises, but of that their account only deemed $50 to be actually eligible for deduction. The forms don't explain the thinking behind that, but it's probably because losses from your horse corporation can't be used to offset unrelated income. If Rafalca had brought in more money, then Rafalca's care and feeding expenses could be deducted from that income, but in 2010 Rob Rom Enterprises doesn't seem to have had much income.

But there's a twist!

[T]he tax code lets you carry disallowed hobby losses forward to offset hobby income in future years. Now that the Romneys' horse is an Olympian, his owners could presumably be paid quite handsomely for his services at the stud farm. Consequently, Mitt and Ann may soon have some income that they actually can use that nearly $78,000 loss to offset--i.e., finally getting the tax deduction that they're taking the heat for today.

I think if Romney's taking heat for anything, it's simply that in his own tax policy documents, he's making big assumptions about the possibility of cutting tax rates and eliminating tax deductions without saying much about which kinds of deductions he wants to eliminate. Is something like forward-carrying of horse-related expenses the kind of thing he would want to eliminate, or would that count as a burdensome tax on job-creating investment and capital formation?

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.

  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Nov. 21 2014 1:38 PM What Happened at Slate This Week? See if you can keep pace with the copy desk, Slate’s most comprehensive reading team.