The Real Stakes in the Contraceptives Fight

A blog about business and economics.
March 5 2012 10:58 AM

The Real Stakes in the Contraceptives Fight


I read two good posts from opposite ends of the political spectrum today both making the same point that in important ways the recent congressional Republican tilt against insurance plans offering contraceptives free of charge is just a tiny skirmish in a larger war that really has nothing to do with sex, women, or birth control.

"ObamaCare is a major step toward socialized health care" is the way Roger Pilon puts it, "You can pretend otherwise—the 'war on women' rhetoric aims at that—but the coercive elements inherent in any socialized scheme come to the surface when conflicts like the one before us arise."


Republicans "want employers to be able to offer health insurance that does not cover contraception, sure" is Jonathan Chait's take, "but that’s a mere way station to the larger goal of denying any health care coverage at all to tens of millions of Americans."

These are both very good points. If we had a country in which there was broad consensus about the idea that society should collectively pay for basic health care services for everyone, we would then have a series of arguments over what does and does not qualify as the kind of basic health care service that should be covered. But we actually don't have that kind of consensus. Almost all of the members of Congress who don't think birth control should count as a covered basic service, don't actually think anything should qualify—at least as regards the health care needs of people born after the year 1957. It's interesting that this profound disagreement about the provision of health care services to people born in 1958 or 1985 exists alongside an absolute consensus that people born in 1957 or earlier should enjoy a single-payer health care system. But the fact is that, as regards people born in the past 54 years, an enormous philosophical chasm has opened up about the whole idea of health care provision. The birth control aspect of this has gotten a lot of press because a lot of people find it more accessible than the larger health care picture, but it's worth seeing the fight in context.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.



Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

IOS 8 Comes Out Today. Do Not Put It on Your iPhone 4S.

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Amazon Is Launching a Serious Run at Apple and Samsung


Slim Pickings at the Network TV Bazaar

Three talented actresses in three terrible shows.


More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

The Ungodly Horror of Having a Bug Crawl Into Your Ear and Scratch Away at Your Eardrum

We Could Fix Climate Change for Free. Now There’s Just One Thing Holding Us Back.

  News & Politics
Sept. 17 2014 7:03 PM Once Again, a Climate Policy Hearing Descends Into Absurdity
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
Sept. 17 2014 6:53 PM LGBTQ Luminaries Honored With MacArthur “Genius” Fellowships
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 6:14 PM Today in Gender Gaps: Biking
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 8:25 PM A New Song and Music Video From Angel Olsen, Indie’s Next Big Thing
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 9:00 PM Amazon Is Now a Gadget Company
  Health & Science
Sept. 17 2014 4:49 PM Schooling the Supreme Court on Rap Music Is it art or a true threat of violence?
Sports Nut
Sept. 17 2014 3:51 PM NFL Jerk Watch: Roger Goodell How much should you loathe the pro football commissioner?