I don't want to put words into anyone's mouth, but it seems to me that most liberals favor:
— Generous provision of universal health care.
— Increased provision of early childhood and day care.
— Steady or falling class sizes in K-12 schools.
— More people attending or completing college.
— More and better physical infrastructure.
— Organic or more broadly sustainable agriculture.
For things like that to occur would not only cost money, but someone would actually need to do the work. It requires human beings to do the jobs. You need more health care workers, more education workers, more construction workers, and more farmers. If you want to add "local" angles to the agricultural piece, that also implies more people transporting goods. And most liberals favored those things even in 2007 when mass unemployment was not a problem. This at least suggests that when liberals imagine the future, they're implicitly imagining a future in which we relying on robots and Chinese people to produce a larger share of the country's flow of manufactured goods. There is a tension between this and President Obama's valorization of manufacturing leading the charge toward the creation of an America "built to last." And yet in my dialogues with liberals after the speech, it seems to me that among my acquaintances the more left-wing ones were the most favorably disposed to Obama's emphases.
TODAY IN SLATE
One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.
The Extraordinary Amicus Brief That Attempts to Explain the Wu-Tang Clan to the Supreme Court Justices
Amazon Is Officially a Gadget Company. Here Are Its Six New Devices.
Uh-Oh. The World’s Oceans Have Broken Their All-Time Heat Record.
The NFL Explains How It Sees “the Role of the Female”
How to Keep Apple From Sharing Your iPhone Data With the Police
How to Order Chinese Food
First, stop thinking of it as “Chinese food.”