The Shrinking Interest Rate Gap   

A blog about business and economics.
Jan. 11 2012 2:48 PM

The Shrinking Interest Rate Gap   

About ten years ago, Greg Mankiw devised a formula to model monetary policy in the United States in the 1990s, which ended up saying that the federal funds rate should equal:

8.5 + 1.4 (Core inflation - Unemployment)

That's with "core inflation" defined as CPI inflation rate over the previous 12 months excluding food and energy and "unemployment" defined using the seasonally adjusted rate. Essentially it's a form of backward-looking Taylor Rule. This isn't, I think, the best way to make monetary policy but it serves as a useful illustration anyway especially since Eddy Elfenbein has taken the formula and projected it forward:


The key thing here is that by these standards the Fed should have set interest rates well below zero during the depths of the recession and it continues to be the case that rates should be negative. The Fed could have and should have achieved this goal by attempting to elevate inflation expectations, but they didn't so the recession has been long and painful. But by this standard, at least, we're fast approaching the moment at which our zero-bounded monetary policy becomes appropriate. At that point, we should expect the economy to start soaking up excess capacity rapidly. I like this post because it's a great wonky demonstration of my recovery winter accelerating growth hypothesis. 12 or 18 months ago, money was way too tight. Now it's still tighter than it should be, but we're much closer to the mark and thus poised for better growth. And by this model at least, a further fall of 0.2 percentage points in the unemployment rate would be enough to get us into the liftoff zone.

That's not really what Mankiw's model was build for, so I wouldn't take the 8.3 percent unemployment rate thing to the bank, but the underlying dynamic will hold for any reasonable variant of the model.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.



Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

The Extraordinary Amicus Brief That Attempts to Explain the Wu-Tang Clan to the Supreme Court Justices

Amazon Is Officially a Gadget Company. Here Are Its Six New Devices.

The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Altered State

The Plight of the Pre-Legalization Marijuana Offender

What should happen to weed users and dealers busted before the stuff was legal?

Surprise! The Women Hired to Fix the NFL Think the NFL Is Just Great.

You Shouldn’t Spank Anyone but Your Consensual Sex Partner

Sept. 17 2014 5:10 PM The Most Awkward Scenario in Which a Man Can Hold a Door for a Woman
  News & Politics
Sept. 17 2014 7:03 PM Once Again, a Climate Policy Hearing Descends Into Absurdity
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
Sept. 17 2014 6:53 PM LGBTQ Luminaries Honored With MacArthur “Genius” Fellowships
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 6:14 PM Today in Gender Gaps: Biking
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 8:25 PM A New Song and Music Video From Angel Olsen, Indie’s Next Big Thing
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 7:23 PM MIT Researchers Are Using Smartphones to Interact With Other Screens
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 17 2014 11:18 AM A Bridge Across the Sky
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.