Why Biased Refs Are Good Business

A blog about business and economics.
Dec. 19 2011 8:49 AM

Why Biased Refs Are Good Business

Referee Peter Gagelmann reacts during the German first division Bundesliga football match Borussia Moenchengladbach vs FSV Mainz 05 in the western German city of Moenchengladbach on December 18, 2011.

Photo by PATRIK STOLLARZ/AFP/Getty Images

Stephen Dubner has a good "football freakonomics" post laying out the evidence that home field (or court) advantage is a real phenomenon across American professional sports and that it's overwhelmingly due to referee bias, rather than "intangibles" about crowd support or home cooking.

What he doesn't do is  illustrate the sound business strategy principles at work here. Researchers emphasize that the bias appears to be completely unconscious, which is true. But it's also so evident in the statistics that you might think league officials would be working diligently to extirpate the bias from the system. In practice, they're totally complacent. And with good reason! The issue is that team-level sports revenues are driven, at the margin, by wins and losses. Obviously different teams have different structural levels of revenue built in (a .500 Mets team will earn more than a .500 Royals team) but in marginal terms more wins = more ticket sales. And home-biased officiating is a neat way to get around the problem that every win requires a loss. If officials systematically have their thumbs on the scale of the home team, then most teams can win most of their home games. And home games are, after all, where you sell your tickets (and parking passes, beer, jerseys, etc.) so this is what matters. Fans want to root, root, root for the home team and see a win. Biased officiating delivers the goods.


Note that this means that technology-driven improvements in official accuracy (instrant replay and such) create a business model dilemma. If you flagrantly refuse to use accuracy-improving new technology, you develop a credibility problem that can end up threatening to undermine the whole sport. But making the close calls more accurate isn't actually desirable.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.


Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

Chief Justice John Roberts Says $1,000 Can’t Buy Influence in Congress. Looks Like He’s Wrong.

After This Merger, One Company Could Control One-Third of the Planet's Beer Sales

Hidden Messages in Corporate Logos

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

How Can We Investigate Potential Dangers of Fracking Without Being Alarmist?

My Year as an Abortion Doula       

  News & Politics
Sept. 15 2014 8:56 PM The Benghazi Whistleblower Who Might Have Revealed a Massive Scandal on his Poetry Blog
Sept. 15 2014 7:27 PM Could IUDs Be the Next Great Weapon in the Battle Against Poverty?
Sept. 15 2014 4:38 PM What Is Straight Ice Cream?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
Brow Beat
Sept. 15 2014 8:58 PM Lorde Does an Excellent Cover of Kanye West’s “Flashing Lights”
Future Tense
Sept. 15 2014 4:49 PM Cheetah Robot Is Now Wireless and Gallivanting on MIT’s Campus
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 15 2014 11:00 AM The Comet and the Cosmic Beehive
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.