<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:slate="http://www.slate.com" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Human Nature</title>
    <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature.fulltext.all.10.rss</link>
    <description />
    <atom:link href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature.fulltext.all.10.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Pro-Life, Pro-Choice Progress</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/11/18/pro_life_pro_choice_progress.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; Recently, pro-life and pro-choice thinkers met at Princeton University for a frank, open-minded discussion of their differences and possible areas of collaboration. It was a useful conversation, illuminating several steps each side could take to advance a common agenda. Here are the takeaways for &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2275072/"&gt; pro-lifers &lt;/a&gt; —and&amp;nbsp;for &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2275256/"&gt; pro-choicers &lt;/a&gt; . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/11/18/pro_life_pro_choice_progress.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Saletan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-18T14:18:00Z</dc:date>
      <slate:dek />
      <slate:section>News and Politics</slate:section>
      <slate:menuline>Pro-Life, Pro-Choice Progress</slate:menuline>
      <slate:id>211101118001</slate:id>
      <slate:author display_name="William Saletan" path="/etc/tags/authors/william_saletan" url="http://www.slate.com/authors.william_saletan.html">William Saletan</slate:author>
      <slate:rubric display_name="Human Nature" path="/etc/tags/slate_rubric/blog">Human Nature</slate:rubric>
      <slate:blog display_name="Human Nature" path="/blogs/humannature">Human Nature</slate:blog>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sodomy and Orgasms: Alternative Theories</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/10/12/sodomy_and_orgasms_alternative_theories.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; Well, shame on me. Not for talking about sodomy—that taboo seems to be fading fast—but for doubting that women love it. These women are now coming forward to affirm that they're into it for their own pleasure, thank you very much. And they aren't alone. Bloggers, blog readers, and &lt;strong&gt; &lt;em&gt; Slate &lt;/em&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; commenters are offering lots of other theories to explain the orgasm data. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; More &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2270622/"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/10/12/sodomy_and_orgasms_alternative_theories.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Saletan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-12T14:19:00Z</dc:date>
      <slate:dek />
      <slate:section>News and Politics</slate:section>
      <slate:menuline>Sodomy and Orgasms: Alternative Theories</slate:menuline>
      <slate:id>211101012001</slate:id>
      <slate:author display_name="William Saletan" path="/etc/tags/authors/william_saletan" url="http://www.slate.com/authors.william_saletan.html">William Saletan</slate:author>
      <slate:rubric display_name="Human Nature" path="/etc/tags/slate_rubric/blog">Human Nature</slate:rubric>
      <slate:blog display_name="Human Nature" path="/blogs/humannature">Human Nature</slate:blog>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sodomy and Orgasms</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/10/07/sodomy_and_orgasms.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; In 1992, 16 percent of women aged 18-24 said they'd tried anal sex. Now 20 percent of women aged 18-19 say they've done it, and by ages 20-24, the number is 40 percent. In 1992, the highest percentage of women in any age group who admitted to anal sex was 33. In 2002, it was 35. Now it's 46. ... &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; Check out the orgasm data. Among women who had vaginal sex in their last encounter, the percentage who said they reached orgasm was 65. Among those who received oral sex, it was 81. But among those who had anal sex, it was 94. Anal sex outscored oral. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; More &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2269951/"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/10/07/sodomy_and_orgasms.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Saletan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-07T12:56:00Z</dc:date>
      <slate:dek />
      <slate:section>News and Politics</slate:section>
      <slate:menuline>Sodomy and Orgasms</slate:menuline>
      <slate:id>211101007001</slate:id>
      <slate:author display_name="William Saletan" path="/etc/tags/authors/william_saletan" url="http://www.slate.com/authors.william_saletan.html">William Saletan</slate:author>
      <slate:rubric display_name="Human Nature" path="/etc/tags/slate_rubric/blog">Human Nature</slate:rubric>
      <slate:blog display_name="Human Nature" path="/blogs/humannature">Human Nature</slate:blog>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Invisible Roommate</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/10/05/the_invisible_roommate.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; Like countless college freshmen before him, Tyler Clementi needed a place to make out, but he had a roommate. So he asked his roommate to clear out of their Rutgers dorm room for a couple of hours. The roommate, Dharun Ravi, obliged him. But Ravi left something behind: his computer. It had a webcam and an Internet connection. That's how Ravi got back into the room. He never touched the door or window. He just tapped into the webcam from a friend's computer down the hall. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; Today's freshmen are grappling with something much stranger than being gay. They're growing up in a world where people are with you even when they aren't. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; More &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2269301/"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 02:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/10/05/the_invisible_roommate.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Saletan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-06T02:24:00Z</dc:date>
      <slate:dek />
      <slate:section>News and Politics</slate:section>
      <slate:menuline>The Invisible Roommate</slate:menuline>
      <slate:id>211101005001</slate:id>
      <slate:author display_name="William Saletan" path="/etc/tags/authors/william_saletan" url="http://www.slate.com/authors.william_saletan.html">William Saletan</slate:author>
      <slate:rubric display_name="Human Nature" path="/etc/tags/slate_rubric/blog">Human Nature</slate:rubric>
      <slate:blog display_name="Human Nature" path="/blogs/humannature">Human Nature</slate:blog>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stem-Cell Throwback</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/08/29/stem_cell_throwback.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; The stem-cell ruling, issued Monday by U.S. District Chief Judge Royce Lamberth, says that federal funding of research using cells derived from destroyed embryos violates federal law. Pro-lifers are ecstatic. &amp;quot;Court Strikes Down Obama Administration Stem Cell Policy,&amp;quot; crows Americans United for Life. But this ruling goes way beyond Obama. It voids Bush's stem-cell policy, too. And it does so on flimsy grounds with sloppy reasoning. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; More &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2264996/"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2265297/"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/08/29/stem_cell_throwback.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Saletan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-29T15:58:00Z</dc:date>
      <slate:dek />
      <slate:section>News and Politics</slate:section>
      <slate:menuline>Stem-Cell Throwback</slate:menuline>
      <slate:id>211100829001</slate:id>
      <slate:author display_name="William Saletan" path="/etc/tags/authors/william_saletan" url="http://www.slate.com/authors.william_saletan.html">William Saletan</slate:author>
      <slate:rubric display_name="Human Nature" path="/etc/tags/slate_rubric/blog">Human Nature</slate:rubric>
      <slate:blog display_name="Human Nature" path="/blogs/humannature">Human Nature</slate:blog>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Donald Duck a Pervert?</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/08/25/is_donald_duck_a_pervert.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; We've seen this pattern before: an allegation of groping, followed by a bunch of other people recalling similar abuse. The initial charge makes the rest of the claims credible. But sometimes the allegations, and even the triggered memories, are false. That's what happened to Tigger. Don't let it happen to Donald Duck. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; More &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2263746"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/08/25/is_donald_duck_a_pervert.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Saletan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-25T04:38:00Z</dc:date>
      <slate:dek />
      <slate:section>News and Politics</slate:section>
      <slate:menuline>Is Donald Duck a Pervert?</slate:menuline>
      <slate:id>211100825002</slate:id>
      <slate:author display_name="William Saletan" path="/etc/tags/authors/william_saletan" url="http://www.slate.com/authors.william_saletan.html">William Saletan</slate:author>
      <slate:rubric display_name="Human Nature" path="/etc/tags/slate_rubric/blog">Human Nature</slate:rubric>
      <slate:blog display_name="Human Nature" path="/blogs/humannature">Human Nature</slate:blog>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Oil Spill's Ironic Ending</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/08/25/the_oil_spill_s_ironic_ending.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; In early May, BP began drilling a &lt;a href="http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=2012968&amp;amp;contentId=7061778"&gt; relief well &lt;/a&gt; to stop the leak. Two weeks later, under orders from the government, it initiated a &lt;a href="http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=2012968&amp;amp;contentId=7062147"&gt; second &lt;/a&gt; relief well. The second well now extends 15,874 feet below the water's surface, and the first has reached a depth of &lt;a href="http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=2012968&amp;amp;contentId=7063829"&gt; 17,864 feet &lt;/a&gt; —just &lt;a href="http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/incident_response/STAGING/local_assets/downloads_pdfs/technical_briefing_transcript_18_07_0730CDT.pdf"&gt; 100 feet &lt;/a&gt; from its destination. The point was to kill the leak by pumping mud and cement into the bottom of the troubled well. But now that the cap is in place, BP and the government are considering a &amp;quot; &lt;a href="http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/incident_response/STAGING/local_assets/downloads_pdfs/BP_technical_audio_07192010.pdf"&gt; static kill &lt;/a&gt; &amp;quot;—pumping in the fatal mud from the top. Three months of drilling for nothing. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; More &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2261058/"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/08/25/the_oil_spill_s_ironic_ending.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Saletan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-25T04:30:00Z</dc:date>
      <slate:dek />
      <slate:section>News and Politics</slate:section>
      <slate:menuline>The Oil Spill's Ironic Ending</slate:menuline>
      <slate:id>211100825001</slate:id>
      <slate:author display_name="William Saletan" path="/etc/tags/authors/william_saletan" url="http://www.slate.com/authors.william_saletan.html">William Saletan</slate:author>
      <slate:rubric display_name="Human Nature" path="/etc/tags/slate_rubric/blog">Human Nature</slate:rubric>
      <slate:blog display_name="Human Nature" path="/blogs/humannature">Human Nature</slate:blog>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ability, Heredity, and &amp;quot;Race&amp;quot;</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/07/14/ability_heredity_and_race.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; There's nothing unusual about dismissing race as social construct. Racism watchdogs do it all the time. But they do it precisely to deny hereditary differences between blacks and whites. The authors of this study are &lt;em&gt; affirming &lt;/em&gt; hereditary differences. That's what they mean by &amp;quot;survival fitness in different parts of the globe during thousands of years.&amp;quot; Evolution in Europe and evolution in Africa produced different results. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; More &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2260314/"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/07/14/ability_heredity_and_race.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Saletan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-14T16:46:00Z</dc:date>
      <slate:dek />
      <slate:section>News and Politics</slate:section>
      <slate:menuline>Ability, Heredity, and &amp;quot;Race&amp;quot;</slate:menuline>
      <slate:id>211100714001</slate:id>
      <slate:author display_name="William Saletan" path="/etc/tags/authors/william_saletan" url="http://www.slate.com/authors.william_saletan.html">William Saletan</slate:author>
      <slate:rubric display_name="Human Nature" path="/etc/tags/slate_rubric/blog">Human Nature</slate:rubric>
      <slate:blog display_name="Human Nature" path="/blogs/humannature">Human Nature</slate:blog>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sex, Food, and Shame</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/07/13/sex_food_and_shame.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; Knee-jerk denunciations of shame, sin, and disgust are a tired and shallow kind of feminism. The food analogy makes that pretty clear. You can try to paint every moral criticism of porn or sexual extremity as an attack on women, but when the same criticisms are offered against men in eating contests-mindless orgies, commercial exploitation, abuse of the body-it's time to open your mind to the possibility that, no, this isn't just about patriarchy or controlling sex. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; More &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2260221/"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/07/13/sex_food_and_shame.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Saletan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-13T19:09:00Z</dc:date>
      <slate:dek />
      <slate:section>News and Politics</slate:section>
      <slate:menuline>Sex, Food, and Shame</slate:menuline>
      <slate:id>211100713001</slate:id>
      <slate:author display_name="William Saletan" path="/etc/tags/authors/william_saletan" url="http://www.slate.com/authors.william_saletan.html">William Saletan</slate:author>
      <slate:rubric display_name="Human Nature" path="/etc/tags/slate_rubric/blog">Human Nature</slate:rubric>
      <slate:blog display_name="Human Nature" path="/blogs/humannature">Human Nature</slate:blog>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Major League Eating</title>
      <link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/07/08/major_league_eating.html</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; Fifty years from now, when historians are looking for a moment that captures the depravity of our age—the gluttony, the self-destruction, the craving for worthless fame—it won't be bathhouses, &lt;em&gt; Big Love &lt;/em&gt; , or AdultFriendFinder. It'll be Joey Chestnut stuffing that 68 &lt;sup&gt; th &lt;/sup&gt; hot dog down his unresisting gullet, live on ESPN. &lt;/p&gt; 
&lt;p&gt; More &lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2259695/"&gt; here &lt;/a&gt; . &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://www.slate.com/blogs/humannature/2010/07/08/major_league_eating.html</guid>
      <dc:creator>William Saletan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-08T11:49:00Z</dc:date>
      <slate:dek />
      <slate:section>News and Politics</slate:section>
      <slate:menuline>Major League Eating</slate:menuline>
      <slate:id>211100708001</slate:id>
      <slate:author display_name="William Saletan" path="/etc/tags/authors/william_saletan" url="http://www.slate.com/authors.william_saletan.html">William Saletan</slate:author>
      <slate:rubric display_name="Human Nature" path="/etc/tags/slate_rubric/blog">Human Nature</slate:rubric>
      <slate:blog display_name="Human Nature" path="/blogs/humannature">Human Nature</slate:blog>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

