Every Wednesday is Tip Day or Quiz Day.
Quiz: Are You a Moderator or an Abstainer?
Often, we know we’d have more long-term happiness if we gave up something that gives us a rush of satisfaction in the short-term: that morning doughnut, that impulse purchase, staying up too late watching TV.
A piece of advice I often see is "Be moderate. Don’t have ice cream every night, but if you try to deny yourself altogether, you’ll fall off the wagon. Allow yourself to have the occasional treat—it will help you stick to your plan."
I’ve come to believe that this is good advice for some people: the moderators . They do better when they try to make moderate changes, when they avoid absolutes and bright lines.
For a long time, I kept trying this strategy of moderation—and failing. Then I read a line from Samuel Johnson: "Abstinence is as easy to me as temperance would be difficult." Like Dr. Johnson, I’m an abstainer .
I find it far easier to give something up altogether than to indulge moderately. When I admitted to myself that I was eating Tasti D-Lite, my favorite frozen "fake food" treat, two and even three times a day, I gave it up cold turkey. That was far easier for me to do than to eat Tasti D-Lite twice a week. If I try to be moderate, I exhaust myself debating, "Today, tomorrow?," "Does this time 'count'?," etc. If I never do something, it requires no self-control for me; if I do something sometimes , it requires enormous self-control.
There’s no right or wrong way—it’s just a matter of knowing which strategy works better for you. If moderators try to abstain, they feel trapped and rebellious. If abstainers try to be moderate, they spend a lot of time justifying why they should go ahead and indulge.
People can be surprisingly judgmental about the approach you take. As an abstainer, I often get disapproving comments like "It’s not healthy to take such a severe approach" or "It would be better to learn how to manage yourself" or "Can’t you let yourself have a little fun?" On the other hand, I hear fellow abstainer types saying to moderators, "You can’t keep cheating and expect to make progress" or "Why don’t you just go cold turkey?" So different approaches work for different people. (Exception: With an actual addiction, like alcohol or cigarettes, people generally accept that abstaining is the only solution.)
You’re a moderator if you
- find that occasional indulgence heightens your pleasure—and strengthens your resolve;
- get panicky at the thought of "never" getting or doing something.
You’re an abstainer if you
- have trouble stopping something once you’ve started;
- aren’t tempted by things that you’ve decided are off-limits.
On the other hand, sometimes instead of trying to give something up, we’re trying to push ourselves to embrace something. Go to the gym, eat vegetables, work on a disagreeable project.
Perhaps this is the flip side of being an abstainer, but I’ve found that if I’m trying to make myself do something, I do better if I do that thing every day . When people ask me advice about keeping a blog, one of my recommendations is "Post every day, or six days a week." Weirdly, it’s easier to write a blog every day than it is to write it three or four times a week. I don’t know how moderators feel about this. Moderators—what do you think? Is it easier to go for a half-hour walk every day or four times a week, for you?
* Mike Vardy of the blog Effing the Dog was nice enough to do an interview with me. I don't think I kept up my end of the comedy, but it was fun to do.
* Interested in starting your own happiness project? If you’d like to take a look at my personal Resolutions Chart, for inspiration, just e-mail me at grubin, then the "at" sign, then gretchenrubin dot com. (Sorry about writing it in that roundabout way; I’m trying to thwart spammers.) Just write "Resolutions Chart" in the subject line.