UK orders Google to censor links to Right To Be Forgotten removal articles.

UK Orders Google to Censor Links to Articles About “Right to Be Forgotten” Removals

UK Orders Google to Censor Links to Articles About “Right to Be Forgotten” Removals

Future Tense
The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Aug. 21 2015 12:32 PM

UK Orders Google to Censor Links to Articles About “Right to Be Forgotten” Removals

15789028250_bf671dec48_z
An elephant may never forget—but Google must, at least in Europe.

Tontantravel.com

The “right to be forgotten” has always been a double whammy of a disaster: an awful policy based on terrible ideas. Under the right, implemented in 2014 by the European Court of Justice, private citizens can petition search engines to hide results that pertain to their pasts. As a policy, the right to be forgotten is bad because companies like Google have legitimate free speech interests in presenting their results as they see fit. As an idea, it’s bad because it bars search engines from publishing truthful information about matters of public concern—a troubling precedent which, taken to its logical end, could lead to serious censorship.

That process has already begun in the United Kingdom, where the Information Commissioner’s Office recently pushed Google further down the memory hole. In an enforcement notice, the ICO demanded that Google take down links to articles about right-to-be-forgotten removals. The trouble began after Google actually complied with a right-to-be-forgotten request made by an individual who committed criminal acts nearly 10 years ago. The removal of all links detailing his actions became itself a news story detailed in several publications. Google retained links to those articles, and they still appear when you search the individual’s name. So he complained—and now the ICO has ordered Google to remove the newer articles, too.

Advertisement

It is difficult to describe the ICO’s demand as anything other than rank censorship. The original right-to-be-forgotten rule may have infringed on protected expression, but at least it only applied to old information. Now, the ICO has asserted its authority to block Google from showing links to contemporary articles that contain truthful speech about controversial public disputes. Not only does the government want to implement the right to be forgotten; it wants to erase evidence of the fact that it has implemented the policy. That’s an unsettling new leap for a right that was initially pitched as a modest privacy measure.

Of course, even in the U.K., the right to be forgotten will still be undermined by the First Amendment: No European government can force Google to alter results on its American search engine. Google.co.uk may be muzzled, but Google.com remains uncowed. Despite decisions by the ECJ and the ICO, Google users around the world need only head over to American Google to get uncensored information. European governments may eventually try to patch this hole. But for now, the right to be forgotten disappears at the American border. 

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Mark Joseph Stern covers courts and the law for Slate.