Republicans send mixed messages ahead of FCC net neutrality vote.

Ahead of FCC Net Neutrality Vote, Republicans Work to Present a United Front

Ahead of FCC Net Neutrality Vote, Republicans Work to Present a United Front

Future Tense
The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Feb. 25 2015 2:05 PM

Ahead of FCC Net Neutrality Vote, Republicans Work to Present a United Front

458751494-network-cables-are-plugged-in-a-server-room-on-november
Republicans may be suffering from a case of crossed wires.

Photo by Michael Bocchieri/Getty Images

On Thursday, the FCC will vote on whether to treat Internet service as a utility. But ahead of this meeting, the Republican stance on net neutrality and Title II utility classification has become kind of muddied.

Net neutrality isn't a completely straightforward partisan issue, so there has always been some uncertainty about what the party line is exactly. Opposing government regulation of a huge industry (that has lots of lobbying money) makes sense for the Republicans, but it's been hard to figure out the best tactic for defending this position when voters on both sides are getting fired up about freedom of information on the Internet.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, the New York Times published an article headlined, "F.C.C. Net Neutrality Rules Clear Hurdle as Republicans Concede to Obama." It outlined some potential sticking points for pro–net neutrality regulation, but basically concluded that Republicans wouldn't stand in the way.

The piece quoted Republican Sen. John Thune, the chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, as saying, “We’re not going to get a signed bill that doesn’t have Democrats’ support. ... This is an issue that needs to have bipartisan support.” And net neutrality advocates were shown doing a victory lap. Mozilla Director Dave Steer told the Times, “We’ve been outspent, outlobbied. We were going up against the second-biggest corporate lobby in D.C., and it looks like we’ve won.” Steer apparently doesn't know how jinxing works.

Thune struck back swiftly, denying that Republicans will go quietly on the issue. He tweeted, "Claims that Republicans conceded on #NetNeutrality are a mischaracterization. I am committed to a legislative solution to @FCC power grab."

Frederick Hill, a Senate Commerce Committee aide, told the Washington Post that even though no bill materialized to address the net neutrality debate before the FCC vote, Republicans still plan to introduce one later to advocate for legislation that would override FCC authority. "Once the rules are made public for review, Sen. Thune is committed to pushing ahead," he said. "The FCC's direction is bad for the Internet and bad for consumers."

Republican representatives Jason Chaffetz of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and Fred Upton, the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, released a statement in response to FCC chairman Tom Wheeler's refusal to testify at an Internet regulation hearing on Wednesday. They said:

We are deeply disappointed in Chairman Wheeler’s decision. As Chairman Wheeler pushes forward with plans to regulate the Internet, he still refuses to directly answer growing concerns about how the rules were developed, how they are structured, and how they will stand up to judicial scrutiny. After hearing from over four million Americans on such an important topic to our economic and cultural future, it's striking that when Congress seeks transparency, Chairman Wheeler opts against it.

Perhaps Wheeler's proposal doesn't have the votes to pass, but it seems like Republicans are resigned to the idea that it does, even as they recapture their will to fight.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.