This Is the New Worst-Case Scenario for Ice Loss in Antarctica

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Aug. 14 2014 2:56 PM

This Is the New Worst-Case Scenario for Ice Loss in Antarctica

79734143-giant-tabular-icebergs-are-surrounded-by-ice-floe-drift
The future of Antarctica is the future of Earth.

Photo by Torsten Blackwood - Pool/Getty Images

In May of this year, a pair of science studies caught the world by surprise.

Together, their evidence confirmed a key Antarctic glacier has likely passed “the point of no return” and is beginning to destabilize. The conclusion was stark: Irreversible collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet has begun, locking in at least 10 feet of sea level rise over the next several hundred years. Mother Jones called it a “holy shit moment for global warming.”

Advertisement

Though it’s supremely depressing that New York City, Mumbai, and Guangzhou will most likely be underwater by the year 3000, those studies felt a bit abstract for those of us concerned about worst-case climate scenarios in our lifetime.

With the most ice on Earth, Antarctica holds the key to the world’s coastal fate. But up until now, there hasn’t been a reliable upper bounds on how much Antarctica as a whole may contribute to global sea level rise over the relatively short term of the next several decades.

A new study published Wednesday in the open-source journal Earth Systems Dynamics provides that upper bounds for the first time, and it’s bigger than we thought: Antarctica alone may contribute up to 37 cm (14.5 inches) to global seas by 2100, more than triple previous worst-case estimates.

In a press release, Anders Levermann of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and lead author of the study said: “Earlier research indicated that Antarctica would become important in the long term. Pulling together all the evidence it seems that Antarctica could become the dominant cause of sea level rise much sooner.” 

There are four major sources of sea level rise that are related to human activity: thermal expansion (as ocean water heats up, it physically expands), melting mountain glaciers worldwide, the continental ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica, and the pumping of groundwater for human use.

According to the September 2013 report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s oceans are currently rising at a rate of 28 cm (11 inches) per century. As global warming accelerates, that pace is expected to quicken exponentially. The IPCC report, which took a snapshot of the state-of-the-art science at the time it was written, estimated a worst-case scenario of 97 cm (38 inches) of sea level rise by 2100, with only about 12 cm (5 inches) coming from Antarctica.

The new study, using models from the Sea Level Response to Ice Sheet Evolution (SeaRISE) intercomparison project, tacks on nearly a foot (25 cm, to be exact) to that scenario. As we saw during Hurricane Sandy in 2012, during big coastal storms, a few inches goes a long way toward crossing dangerous flooding thresholds, like filling the subways with sea water.

Since there’s never been a study like this done before for the entire continent, there’s still better research needed, especially relating to how the ocean and ice interact. The authors were careful to include the full range of sub-surface melting sensitivities in an attempt to capture every plausible scenario. Since the study tried to model the entire continent’s behavior, the authors couldn’t look in detail at the inherent instability of the glaciers most likely to contribute to shorter-term sea level rise, namely the Pine Island and Thwaites glaciers in the Admunsen Sea region of West Antarctica. The Thwaites glacier is the one that made the news back in May. The three models the authors used also weren’t able to explicitly capture sudden nonlinear events like ice calving or other ocean-ice feedbacks that may accelerate ice loss. To account for this, the authors chose a probabilistic approach blending all three models, in part because there hasn’t been enough research done on the Antarctic to choose which model is best.

Still, the new study pushes the urgency of coastal cities planning for the worst effects of the encroaching ocean. It’s also clear about one of the biggest remaining sources of uncertainty: humans themselves. What we do over the next few decades to slow the rate of fossil fuel emissions that drive global warming will help determine how quickly the oceans warm, and therefore how quickly coastal Antarctic glaciers are melted from below. The authors find that if the world gets in gear and sharply reduces its output of carbon dioxide, with a little bit of luck, Antarctica may not melt at all this century.

Eric Rignot, a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the University of California-Irvine and a lead author of one of the big Antarctica studies in May thinks that may be “wishful thinking.” In an email message, Rignot, who was not directly involved with the paper released Wednesday, says the new study is “a step in the right direction,” in line with what recent satellite observations of Antarctica show: the frozen continent is already melting at a rate far above what previous models had predicted. “A lot of folks out there refuse to acknowledge what the satellite record shows.”

By phone, I spoke with Ben Smith of the University of Washington’s Polar Science Center and one of the authors of the other big Antarctica study in May. He agrees the takeaway from the new study is clear: “You can make a big difference on what the ice sheet does based on how fast the atmosphere warms. If you’re sitting in Bangladesh, you don’t really care why the sea level rose.”

Smith added: “While the very long-term consequences are pretty set in stone, how quickly we get to them really depends on what we do now. Things happen in a more drastic way the longer you wait. A meter in 10,000 years is probably not a big problem. A meter in a hundred years is probably a big problem.”

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Eric Holthaus is a meteorologist who writes about weather and climate for Slate’s Future Tense. Follow him on Twitter.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Meet the New Bosses

How the Republicans would run the Senate.

The Government Is Giving Millions of Dollars in Electric-Car Subsidies to the Wrong Drivers

Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.

Cheez-Its. Ritz. Triscuits.

Why all cracker names sound alike.

Friends Was the Last Purely Pleasurable Sitcom

The Eye

This Whimsical Driverless Car Imagines Transportation in 2059

Medical Examiner

Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?  

A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.

The Afghan Town With a Legitimately Good Tourism Pitch

A Futurama Writer on How the Vietnam War Shaped the Series

  News & Politics
Photography
Sept. 21 2014 11:34 PM People’s Climate March in Photos Hundreds of thousands of marchers took to the streets of NYC in the largest climate rally in history.
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 20 2014 6:30 AM The Man Making Bill Gates Richer
  Life
Quora
Sept. 22 2014 8:07 AM Why Haven’t the Philadelphia Eagles Ever Won a Super Bowl?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 19 2014 4:58 PM Steubenville Gets the Lifetime Treatment (And a Cheerleader Erupts Into Flames)
  Slate Plus
Science
Sept. 22 2014 8:08 AM Slate Voice: “Why Is So Much Honey Clover Honey?” Mike Vuolo shares the story of your honey.
  Arts
Television
Sept. 21 2014 9:00 PM Attractive People Being Funny While Doing Amusing and Sometimes Romantic Things Don’t dismiss it. Friends was a truly great show.
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 22 2014 7:47 AM Predicting the Future for the U.S. Government The strange but satisfying work of creating the National Intelligence Council’s Global Trends report.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 22 2014 5:30 AM MAVEN Arrives at Mars
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.