Peer Review Fraud Is Very Real, Very Scandalous, and Very Bad

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
July 8 2014 6:34 PM

A Journal Is Retracting 60 Papers Because of Peer Review Fraud

It may not be entirely fair to liken a "peer review and citation ring" to the academic version of an extortion ring, but there's certainly fraud involved in both. Retraction Watch, a blog dedicated to chronicling which academic papers have been withdrawn, is reporting that SAGE Publishing, a group that puts out numerous peer-reviewed journals, is retracting 60 papers from its Journal of Vibration and Control after an internal investigation uncovered extensive evidence of severe peer-review fraud.

Apparently researcher Peter Chen, formerly of National Pingtung University of Education in Taiwan, made multiple submission and reviewer accounts—possibly along with other researchers at his institution or elsewhere—so that he could influence the peer review system. When Chen or someone else from the ring submitted a paper, the group could manipulate who reviewed the research, and on at least one occasion Chen served as his own reviewer. The SAGE press release notes:

While investigating the JVC papers submitted and reviewed by Peter Chen, it was discovered that the author had created various aliases on SAGE Track, providing different email addresses to set up more than one account. Consequently, SAGE scrutinised further the co-authors of and reviewers selected for Peter Chen’s papers, [and] these names appeared to form part of a peer review ring.

When SAGE and its then-editor-in-chief confronted Chen, he didn't cooperate with the investigation, so in September 2013 SAGE notified National Pingtung University of Education. Chen resigned at the beginning of February.

Retraction Watch reports that in a follow-up statement, SAGE said that 130 fake accounts seem to have been involved in the ring. Still, the publisher feels that its intensive, multi-year investigation has uncovered the totality of the fraud.

Although attempts to mislead the academic community are extremely rare, there will occasionally be fraudulent and unethical individuals seeking to abuse the system. Both SAGE and Journal of Vibration and Control are committed to upholding the true spirit of peer review while continuing to introduce new measures to reinforce the review process.

Hopefully SAGE really has contained the problem. It may not quite be a breezy beach read, but the Journal of Vibration and Control doesn't need any more drama.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Lily Hay Newman is lead blogger for Future Tense.