Android Users Won’t Drop Money on Just Any App

Future Tense
The Citizen's Guide to the Future
June 26 2014 12:46 PM

Android Users Won’t Drop Money on Just Any App

The majority of smartphone owners have Androids, but iOS users are the big spenders.

Photo from Shutterstock/Phil Tinkler.

Wednesday at Google's I/O developer conference, the company released hard numbers for the first time about how much it has been paying out to developers and how many monthly active users there are on Android. And as venture capitalist Benedict Evans points out on his blog, the numbers confirm what people have suspected for awhile: iOS users spend a lot more money on apps.

In fact, even though there are more than double the number of Android users (about 1 billion vs. 470 million), iOS users still spend double the money on apps. (Evans estimates that Apple paid iOS app developers $10 billion in the last 12 months vs. the $5 billion Google paid Android developers.) If there are double the Android users and they spend half as much, Android’s average revenue per user is about one-quarter what it is for iOS.


Some of the reasons for these differences are well known. For example, Android phones tend to be cheaper than iPhones, and many of Android's users are in developing countries. As a result, Android users aren't making as much of an initial investment in their phones and may not have disposable income for buying apps. Evans adds deeper commentary, noting:

Many people in [developing] countries lack credit cards and Google has been very slow to offer carrier billing ... [and] if developers believe that Android users dfo not pay, then their behavior will be affected—they may offer a free ad-supported app instead of a paid app, or have a lower price. And if they decide not to support Android or support it second, then their users will gravitate to iPhone first, which becomes self-fulfilling.

Though to U.S. consumers it may seem like Android and iOS compete pretty directly, even broad stats like these show that they actually pursue different market share and user bases. It’s not rigid, though. Buck the trends and be whatever type of mobile user you want.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Lily Hay Newman is lead blogger for Future Tense.



The Ebola Story

How our minds build narratives out of disaster.

The Budget Disaster That Completely Sabotaged the WHO’s Response to Ebola

PowerPoint Is the Worst, and Now It’s the Latest Way to Hack Into Your Computer

The Shooting Tragedies That Forged Canada’s Gun Politics

A Highly Unscientific Ranking of Crazy-Old German Beers


Welcome to 13th Grade!

Some high schools are offering a fifth year. That’s a great idea.


The Actual World

“Mount Thoreau” and the naming of things in the wilderness.

Want Kids to Delay Sex? Let Planned Parenthood Teach Them Sex Ed.

Would You Trust Walmart to Provide Your Health Care? (You Should.)

  News & Politics
Oct. 22 2014 9:42 PM Landslide Landrieu Can the Louisiana Democrat use the powers of incumbency to save herself one more time?
Continuously Operating
Oct. 22 2014 2:38 PM Crack Open an Old One A highly unscientific evaluation of Germany’s oldest breweries.
Gentleman Scholar
Oct. 22 2014 5:54 PM May I Offer to Sharpen My Friends’ Knives? Or would that be rude?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 22 2014 4:27 PM Three Ways Your Text Messages Change After You Get Married
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Oct. 22 2014 5:27 PM The Slate Walking Dead Podcast A spoiler-filled discussion of Episodes 1 and 2.
Oct. 22 2014 11:54 PM The Actual World “Mount Thoreau” and the naming of things in the wilderness.
Future Tense
Oct. 22 2014 5:33 PM One More Reason Not to Use PowerPoint: It’s The Gateway for a Serious Windows Vulnerability
  Health & Science
Wild Things
Oct. 22 2014 2:42 PM Orcas, Via Drone, for the First Time Ever
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.