A New California Bill Would Protect Your Right to Talk Smack About Companies in Online Reviews

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
May 20 2014 1:58 PM

A New California Bill Would Protect Your Right to Talk Smack About Companies in Online Reviews

Writing scathing reviews is cathartic and fun ... until someone gets sued.

Photo from Shutterstock/CandyBox Images.

You buy a mop online. It's really crappy. You send it back and write some harsh, rant-y reviews about it. Seems pretty standard. But increasingly companies are trying to avoid this scenario by censoring comments or even taking legal action against the authors of negative reviews. The California legislature wants it to stop.

A bill that passed the state assembly last week would make it illegal for companies to prohibit their customers from writing bad reviews. Currently many companies bury such a clause in their terms of service for making a purchase. Whether you buy an item directly from the company or from a third party like Amazon, this agreement can still apply. And if you never personally purchased the item, you can still be subject to a service agreement, which includes speech limitations if you make a commenting account on the company’s website.


Though the bill still needs to pass the state senate and be signed by the governor, its existence is bringing more publicity to an issue that has been percolating under the radar for the past few years. AB 2365, which was introduced by assembly member John A. Pérez in February, would make an agreement "unlawful if it contains a provision requiring the consumer to waive his or her right to make any statement regarding the consumer's experience with the business, unless the waiver was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, as specified."

This means that companies have the right to control customer speech on their sites, but only if they make it explicitly clear that their user agreement involves curtailing speech. If the statement is buried in a long agreement, the legislation argues that the customer's agreement may not be "knowing" and "voluntary."

Ars Technica points out multiple examples of people getting sued for posting negative reviews online. In one case Mediabridge, a router manufacturer, sent brutal letters to the authors of negative Amazon reviews threatening to sue them. In another instance, toy company KlearGear sued a customer for negative comments on the consumer protection and information site RipoffReport.com.

Pérez told the Los Angeles Times, "If merchants think that our 1st Amendment free speech rights need to be curtailed, they should say so upfront and in plain language." If you want to vent about a bad purchase but you're like, well, basically everyone, and you never read terms and condition statements, this law is for you.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Lily Hay Newman is lead blogger for Future Tense.



Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

The Extraordinary Amicus Brief That Attempts to Explain the Wu-Tang Clan to the Supreme Court Justices

Amazon Is Officially a Gadget Company. Here Are Its Six New Devices.

The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Altered State

The Plight of the Pre-Legalization Marijuana Offender

What should happen to weed users and dealers busted before the stuff was legal?

Surprise! The Women Hired to Fix the NFL Think the NFL Is Just Great.

You Shouldn’t Spank Anyone but Your Consensual Sex Partner

Sept. 17 2014 5:10 PM The Most Awkward Scenario in Which a Man Can Hold a Door for a Woman
  News & Politics
Sept. 17 2014 7:03 PM Once Again, a Climate Policy Hearing Descends Into Absurdity
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
Dear Prudence
Sept. 18 2014 6:00 AM All Shook Up My 11-year-old has been exploring herself with my “back massager.” Should I stop her?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 6:14 PM Today in Gender Gaps: Biking
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 8:25 PM A New Song and Music Video From Angel Olsen, Indie’s Next Big Thing
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 7:23 PM MIT Researchers Are Using Smartphones to Interact With Other Screens
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 18 2014 7:30 AM Red and Green Ghosts Haunt the Stormy Night
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.