The FCC’s Controversial Internet Changes Are in the Fast Lane for Approval

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
May 15 2014 2:30 PM

FCC Votes in Favor of Controversial Internet Fast Lane

Demonstrators protest FCC net neutrality reforms.

Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images

On Thursday, the FCC voted in favor of Chairman Tom Wheeler's proposed net neutrality reforms, which include authorizing the Internet "fast lane." Under the plan, Internet service providers may be allowed to charge websites for privileging their content and providing it to consumers at faster speeds.

Lily Hay Newman Lily Hay Newman

Lily Hay Newman is lead blogger for Future Tense.

The FCC committee approved the proposal in a 3-2 vote. Though it is a big step forward (or backward, depending on your perspective), the decision is not final—it will now be opened to 120 days of public comment. The FCC is working to get revised rules on the books by the end of the year, though.


In defending the plan against critics, Wheeler noted that the system wouldn't allow "commercially unreasonable" practices, like delivering content to consumers at slower speeds than the baseline they are paying for from their ISP. Wheeler told the New York Times recently, “The focus of this proposal is on maintaining a broadly available, fast and robust Internet. ... Our goal is rules that will encourage broadband providers to continually upgrade service to all.”

Many mistrust the proposal, though, including some large tech companies and protesters who were demonstrating both outside the meeting and inside. Four protesters were removed by security in the course of the proceedings.

Even Democrats who voted in favor of opening the rules to public comment had concerns. "I believe the process that got us to rulemaking today was flawed," commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel told the Washington Post. "I would have preferred a delay."

The Times notes that the two Republicans who voted against the plan oppose it on the grounds that the FCC is overstepping its authority by making rules that Congress should instead decide on.

Though the open comment period leaves time for reconsideration, it seems like it will take significant force for protesters to halt the initiative's momentum. One movement gathering steam: getting people acquainted with the slow lane.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Lily Hay Newman is lead blogger for Future Tense.


Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

Chief Justice John Roberts Says $1,000 Can’t Buy Influence in Congress. Looks Like He’s Wrong.

After This Merger, One Company Could Control One-Third of the Planet's Beer Sales

Hidden Messages in Corporate Logos

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

How Can We Investigate Potential Dangers of Fracking Without Being Alarmist?

My Year as an Abortion Doula       

  News & Politics
Sept. 15 2014 8:56 PM The Benghazi Whistleblower Who Might Have Revealed a Massive Scandal on his Poetry Blog
Sept. 15 2014 7:27 PM Could IUDs Be the Next Great Weapon in the Battle Against Poverty?
Sept. 15 2014 4:38 PM What Is Straight Ice Cream?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
Brow Beat
Sept. 15 2014 8:58 PM Lorde Does an Excellent Cover of Kanye West’s “Flashing Lights”
Future Tense
Sept. 15 2014 4:49 PM Cheetah Robot Is Now Wireless and Gallivanting on MIT’s Campus
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 15 2014 11:00 AM The Comet and the Cosmic Beehive
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.