Flight 370 disappearance: Why I think the missing airliner could be in Central Asia.

Why I Think It’s Very Possible That the Missing Airliner Is in Central Asia

Future Tense
The Citizen's Guide to the Future
March 15 2014 6:24 PM

Why I Think It’s Very Possible That the Missing Airliner Is in Central Asia

No sign of MH370 here.


I’ve been covering the story of missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 for four days now, and it’s settled into a rhythm. Every day, new evidence points to a conclusion that beforehand would have seemed laughably absurd. We publish an analysis of the situation that seems most likely to us. Readers scoff. Further evidence emerges that reinforces the once-crazy notion, and some proportion of the doubters come around. Then even more implausible information turns up, and it’s off the to the fringes again.

My post from this morning, in which I asserted that the plane is most likely in western China or an adjacent Turkic area, stands out for having received an extra measure of skepticism. “Impossible,” many have declared, in comments and over Twitter. So I’d like to go back and further explain my logic in coming to the conclusion I did.


The first thing I want to make absolutely clear is that my entire premise is based on today’s statement by the Malaysian Prime Minister, and the accompanying chart showing two arcs where the Malaysians believe MH370 happened to be when the ping was detected by satellite at 8:10 a.m., Malaysia time. If that assertion does not hold up, then everything I’m about to say falls apart.

Color MH370 location map

Image from the Malaysian government.

Why do I put so much credence into it? Because the Malaysians have received a lot of abuse for their failure to release more information about the incident, and they have rolled out the most important politician in the country, the head of the government, to stand behind this one fact:

There has been intense speculation. We understand the desperate need for information on behalf of the families and those watching around the world. But we have a responsibility to the investigation and the families to only release information that has been corroborated. …
Today, based on raw satellite data that was obtained from the satellite data service provider, we can confirm that the aircraft shown in the primary radar data was flight MH370. After much forensic work and deliberation, the F.A.A., N.T.S.B., A.A.I.B. and the Malaysian authorities, working separately on the same data, concur. According to the new data, the last confirmed communication between the plane and the satellite was at 8:11 a.m. Malaysian time on Saturday 8th March.

So this is about the closest thing we have to a bankable fact in this whole strange affair. It’s worth hanging a hat on. Not betting one’s life on, sure, but hanging a hat.

For the purposes of this discussion, then, let’s assume that at 8:10 a.m. on March 8, MH370 was located somewhere along the red arc. I believe that that range can be plausibly narrowed down significantly.

First, was the plane on the northern arc or the southern arc? Many people have argued that the southern arc is by far the most likely, for reasons I’ll detail shortly. But I do not think they are right, because there are only two kinds of place along the southern arc: ocean and small islands. (There is also a swath of western Java, but it’s short enough that I’ll just go ahead and ignore it.)

As for the first, I find it impossible to imagine that MH370 landed on a small island without being noticed.

As for the second, I find it impossible to reconcile with my understanding of human nature that someone would commandeer a plane, maneuver it skillfully and with great imagination through a well-monitored zone of radar coverage, fly for eight hours, and then just go pffft in the middle of an ocean. To believe this scenario, I think you would have to overlook for me what has become a bedrock assumption about this case: that whoever carried it out is extremely intelligent, daring, dedicated, and brave. (Not words you’re supposed to apply to a bad guy, but neither his motives or the nature of his deeds has yet been established, so I’ll let them stand for now.)

I conclude, therefore, that the plane wound up on the northern arc. The reason many find this to be incomprehensible is that, they argue, it would be impossible to penetrate the military radar coverage of multiple nations with a commandeered jet. It simply could not have gone through without being detected.

But is it really so impossible? We already know that the airliner traversed a good chunk of Malaysian airspace without being detected in real time (though it later could be discerned in recorded data that was reviewed later). What’s more, a number of the countries through which MH370 might have flown turn out to have far less capable military radar systems than many of us might have imagined. An astonishing report published in Reuters today suggests that “much of the airspace [in the region] over water—and in many cases over land—lacks sophisticated or properly monitored radar coverage.”

"Several nations will be embarrassed by how easy it is to trespass their airspace," said Air Vice Marshal Michael Harwood, a retired British Royal Air Force pilot and ex-defense attache to Washington DC. "Too many movies and Predator (unmanned military drone) feeds from Afghanistan have suckered people into thinking we know everything and see everything. You get what you pay for. And the world, by and large, does not pay.”

The article has some real jaw-droppers. I did not know, for instance, that India operates its military radar on an “as-needed” basis. In order to be detected, apparently, whoever was flying MH370 would have to have called up the Indian armed forces first.

Could China be expected to do better? Perhaps. It certainly has been aggressive in declaring its intention to monitor at least some of its airspace. That still doesn’t mean that a clever and determined pilot couldn’t get through. One possibility might be to fly “nap of the earth,” close enough to the surface of the earth to elude the sweeps of a radar beam. (“Nap” stands for “near as possible.”) This would require a much higher fuel burn and result in a lower speed, but neither of those facts would necessarily undermine the plausibility of this scenario since the flight didn’t get very far in the six hours between 2:15 a.m. and 8:11 a.m.; either he went high and fast on a circuitous route (like the earlier zigzag performed just before disappearing from the military radio data) or low and slow. Going low would have forced him to go a lot slower, but this doesn’t pose a problem to the theory if he had a full six hours to travel to travel the relatively short distance of 2,200 miles.

There’s no way to tell for sure at this point. But if the dual-arc information is correct, then whoever took MH370 must have figured out some way to get through the radar.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Jeff Wise is a New York-based magazine writer and author of the Kindle Single The Plane That Wasn't There: Why We Haven't Found MH370 and the book Extreme Fear: The Science of Your Mind in Danger. A contributing editor at Travel + Leisure, he specializes in aviation, adventure, and psychology. He tweets as @ManvBrain and blogs at JeffWise.net.

  Slate Plus
Lexicon Valley
March 31 2015 9:17 AM The Redline of March Overheard on email: Slates copy desk rounds up the month’s style and grammar rulings.