The Decline of Weibo Doesn't Mean Chinese Authorities Have Tamed the Internet

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Feb. 12 2014 12:42 PM

The Decline of Weibo Doesn't Mean Chinese Authorities Have Tamed the Internet

Weibo: so 2012?

Photo by MARK RALSTON/AFP/Getty Images

The once almighty Sina Weibo, a microblogging site commonly referred to as China’s version of Twitter, is apparently on the decline. According to research commissioned by the Telegraph, the number of posts has dropped by up to 70 percent, following a Communist Party campaign to intimidate influential users. Weibo has also lost users. Will the decline of Weibo strike a blow to the power of the Chinese Internet? The answer is no. As the power of the Internet grows, so do authorities’ attempts to keep it in check. In that sense, Weibo’s fall is just further proof of its influence.

Weibo once looked indomitable. Having attracted more than 500 million users (even if some are zombie accounts), at one point there appeared to be more people on Weibo than there are people in the United States. In Western media stories about China, the Weibo commenter is the new “man in the street.” Even American celebrities got on board. Tom Cruise has a Weibo account, as does Beyoncé.

Weibo is also subject to pervasive censorship, with countless banned words. But Chinese netizens have long found ways to get around keyword filters and human censors. They purposely miswrite words, mix Chinese characters with Roman letters, or just find clever ways to get their point across. Too sensitive to talk about “June 4,” the day of the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown? Try “May 35” instead. That is, of course, until May 35 also became a sensitive term. Sometimes the sheer volume of posts on Weibo seemed to overwhelm the censors, and so news, information, and rumors managed to snake through. Furthermore, an influential Weibo account could have greater broadcasting power than a local newspaper. In a country whose government fears physical assembly and collective action, one person could reach tens of millions via a mobile phone. 


Weibo’s successor may be the social networking app Weixin, or Wechat, which the New York Times described as “part Facebook, part Instagram and even part walkie-talkie.” Weixin, however, appears better suited for networking within smaller groups, rather than speaking to the masses. This raises an unsettling question: If the drop in Weibo interest is indeed due to censorship (and not simply to the fact that Weixin is cooler), then have the authorities “won”? 

Again, no. After having observed the Chinese Internet for a decade, I have seen plenty of these shifts. When I first started looking at the Chinese Internet in 2004, everyone was talking about bulletin board systems. By 2006 BBS were lame, and the cool netizens were talking about the power of blogs. Then blogs were out, and microblogs were in. Twitter looked promising, but then it was blocked by Chinese authorities. There was a moment of excitement for Fanfou, a Chinese Twitter clone, but then that was shut down. (Fanfou did eventually return.) So in swept Weibo. Yet none of these changes have stemmed the power and dynamism of the Chinese Internet. Just as the deaths of Friendster or MySpace didn’t signal the end of the Web.

Most notable is how the essence of the Chinese Internet story remains the same. It’s always been a cat-and-mouse game between online critics and online censors.  The Internet is the place where people vent their grievances, share and receive information, and, perhaps most important, find people like themselves. It’s where they realize, perhaps for the first time, that they are not alone. Or as one Beijing Internet dissident said to me, “now I know who my comrades are.” (That line became the title of my new book, which comes out this month.)

On the Internet, ordinary Chinese discover that they have a voice and other people can hear it. Social media fads come and go, Web sites rise and fall, words are written and deleted. But that discovery is impossible to erase.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Emily Parker is a Future Tense fellow and digital diplomacy adviser at the New America Foundation. She is the author of Now I Know Who My Comrades Are.


War Stories

The Right Target

Why Obama’s airstrikes against ISIS may be more effective than people expect.

The One National Holiday Republicans Hope You Forget

It’s Legal for Obama to Bomb Syria Because He Says It Is

I Stand With Emma Watson on Women’s Rights

Even though I know I’m going to get flak for it.

Should You Recline Your Seat? Two Economists Weigh In.


It Is Very, Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice

Or, why it is very, very stupid to compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice.

Building a Better Workplace

In Defense of HR

Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.

Why Is This Mother in Prison for Helping Her Daughter Get an Abortion?

Politico Wonders Why Gabby Giffords Is So “Ruthless” on Gun Control

Sept. 23 2014 4:45 PM An Up-Close Look at the U.S.–Mexico Border
  News & Politics
Sept. 23 2014 6:40 PM Coalition of the Presentable Don’t believe the official version. Meet America’s real allies in the fight against ISIS.
Sept. 23 2014 2:08 PM Home Depot’s Former Lead Security Engineer Had a Legacy of Sabotage
Sept. 23 2014 1:57 PM Would a Second Sarkozy Presidency End Marriage Equality in France?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 23 2014 2:32 PM Politico Asks: Why Is Gabby Giffords So “Ruthless” on Gun Control?
  Slate Plus
Political Gabfest
Sept. 23 2014 3:04 PM Chicago Gabfest How to get your tickets before anyone else.
Brow Beat
Sept. 23 2014 8:38 PM “No One in This World” Is One of Kutiman’s Best, Most Impressive Songs
Future Tense
Sept. 23 2014 5:36 PM This Climate Change Poem Moved World Leaders to Tears Today
  Health & Science
Sept. 23 2014 4:33 PM Who Deserves Those 4 Inches of Airplane Seat Space? An investigation into the economics of reclining.
Sports Nut
Sept. 23 2014 7:27 PM You’re Fired, Roger Goodell If the commissioner gets the ax, the NFL would still need a better justice system. What would that look like?