Should Your Doctor Be Allowed to Google You?

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Oct. 8 2013 7:12 PM

Should Your Doctor Be Allowed to Google You?

Patients sit in a doctor's waiting room.

Photo by Adam Berry/Getty Images

You probably aren’t entirely honest with your doctor (or dentist). Maybe you slightly exaggerate how frequently you exercise or round down how much you drink. Perhaps you indulge in the occasional social cigarette but don’t want to admit to it during your physical.

Torie Bosch Torie Bosch

Torie Bosch is the editor of Future Tense, a project of Slate, the New America Foundation, and Arizona State that looks at the implications of new technologies. 

What if your doctor called you out on those lies—by calling up your Facebook page right in the exam room and pointing to a photo that shows you smoking?


The September/October issue of the Hastings Center Report, a bioethics journal, asks whether it’s OK for doctors and other health care workers to “google their patients.” To frame the question, the Report offers a case study: A 26-year-old woman asks doctors to perform a preventative double mastectomy. In her reporting, her family tree was positively riddled with cancer:  

She reported that she had developed melanoma at twenty-five; that her mother, sister, aunts, and a cousin all had breast cancer; that a cousin had ovarian cancer at nineteen; and that a brother was treated for esophageal cancer at fifteen.

That didn’t sound right to her doctors. They went to her primary care physician to get more information, but instead found more red flags: The woman had been diagnosed with an “atypical mole,” not melanoma, and some of her primary care physician’s colleagues were skeptical about her self-reported history. In the end, the doctors found Facebook pages that suggested the patient was suffering from something else entirely—possibly Munchausen by Internet, in which someone pretends to be sick, often with cancer, to get attention or money. (To be fair, it’s not clear whether she was trying to fool people in real life or online.) The surgery did not take place.

Alongside the case study, the Hastings Center Report has two commentaries on the ethical issues at play: one that argues that the doctors shouldn’t have Googled, and one that says they did the right thing. (Each has three co-authors.) The con camp writes that Internet searches “can erode provider-patient trust” and are “an invasion of privacy.” They conclude, “Why would a health care provider google a patient rather than just ask the individual in person?”

That seems overly credulous, given that the case study says that the patient was asked about her history—and apparently lied. The opposing commentary agrees, dismissing the “never-google” crowd as taking an “abstinence-only approach.” They argue that while of course it’s preferable to get information directly from the patient, “it would be irresponsible not to exhaust all resources in learning about a patient with such troubling red flags.” They make it clear that they don’t think every patient should be Googled, but that “checklists and guidelines” could help determine who should be searched—like those suspected of doctor shopping or who give inconsistent histories.

If the doctors hadn’t searched for more information about the 26-year-old patient, they might have performed an invasive surgery for no reason, putting her at risk of genuine physical problems. Furthermore, it might have allowed her to double down on her false claims of illness, allowing her to get more sympathy or even money out of people. As my colleague Justin Peters has written, it never ends well when you fake cancer.

I don’t want my doctor to poke around my social media presence for evidence that I’m sugar-coating the truth about my diet. But then again, my fudge doesn’t involve a scalpel.   

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.



Blacks Don’t Have a Corporal Punishment Problem

Americans do. But when blacks exhibit the same behaviors as others, it becomes part of a greater black pathology. 

I Bought the Huge iPhone. I’m Already Thinking of Returning It.

Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.

Lifetime Didn’t Think the Steubenville Rape Case Was Dramatic Enough

So they added a little self-immolation.

Two Damn Good, Very Different Movies About Soldiers Returning From War

Medical Examiner

The Most Terrifying Thing About Ebola 

The disease threatens humanity by preying on humanity.

Students Aren’t Going to College Football Games as Much Anymore, and Schools Are Getting Worried

The Good Wife Is Cynical, Thrilling, and Grown-Up. It’s Also TV’s Best Drama.

  News & Politics
Sept. 19 2014 9:15 PM Chris Christie, Better Than Ever
Sept. 19 2014 6:35 PM Pabst Blue Ribbon is Being Sold to the Russians, Was So Over Anyway
Inside Higher Ed
Sept. 19 2014 1:34 PM Empty Seats, Fewer Donors? College football isn’t attracting the audience it used to.
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 19 2014 4:58 PM Steubenville Gets the Lifetime Treatment (And a Cheerleader Erupts Into Flames)
  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Sept. 19 2014 12:00 PM What Happened at Slate This Week? The Slatest editor tells us to read well-informed skepticism, media criticism, and more.
Brow Beat
Sept. 19 2014 4:48 PM You Should Be Listening to Sbtrkt
Future Tense
Sept. 19 2014 6:31 PM The One Big Problem With the Enormous New iPhone
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 19 2014 5:09 PM Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?   A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.