Reddit Apologizes for Boston “Witch Hunt,” But What’s to Stop It From Happening Again?

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
April 22 2013 7:24 PM

Reddit Apologizes for Boston “Witch Hunt,” But What’s to Stop It From Happening Again?

Reddit won an award for "Best Social Impact" at this year's Crunchies tech awards in San Francisco.
Reddit won an award for "Best Social Impact" at this year's Crunchies tech awards in San Francisco.

Photo by Steve Jennings/Getty Images for The Crunchies

A big reason for Reddit’s popularity is the site’s freewheeling spirit. Under cover of anonymity, its users can say and do what they like, even if it’s politically incorrect or might hurt someone’s feelings. Almost anything is in-bounds, as long as no one gets doxed—i.e., has his or her personal information revealed. The prohibition against posting personal information is one of only five core rules of Reddit, and it’s the one that gives the site its character.

Will Oremus Will Oremus

Will Oremus is Slate's senior technology writer.

So what to make of a week in which well-meaning Redditors rushed headlong into the hunt for the Boston bombers, only to focus the public’s attention and suspicion on one innocent bystander after another?

Advertisement

On Monday, the site’s general manager, Erik Martin, wrote a blog post titled “Reflections on the Recent Boston Crisis.” After extolling all the ways in which the site’s users helped out during the tragedy and aftermath, Martin stated that, “though started with noble intentions, some of the activity on Reddit fueled online witch hunts and dangerous speculation which spiraled into very negative consequences for innocent parties.” And he briefly explored the purpose and limitations of the site’s no-personal-information policy:

A few years ago, reddit enacted a policy to not allow personal information on the site. This was because “let’s find out who this is” events frequently result in witch hunts, often incorrectly identifying innocent suspects and disrupting or ruining their lives. We hoped that the crowdsourced search for new information would not spark exactly this type of witch hunt. We were wrong. …
This crisis has reminded all of us of the fragility of people’s lives and the importance of our communities, online as well as offline. These communities and lives are now interconnected in an unprecedented way. Especially when the stakes are high we must strive to show good judgement and solidarity. One of the greatest strengths of decentralized, self-organizing groups is the ability to quickly incorporate feedback and adapt. reddit was born in the Boston area (Medford, MA to be precise). After this week, which showed the best and worst of reddit's potential, we hope that Boston will also be where reddit learns to be sensitive of its own power.

The first time I read this, I was nodding my head. Then I got to the end and thought, Wait—that’s it? The action verb in Martin’s final sentence is hope. He hopes the site “learns to be sensitive of its own power.” But what does that mean, exactly? Does it mean that the site’s users should get out of the amateur-detective business? Does it mean that they should create special private forums for that purpose? What would a “sensitive” crowd-sourced investigation look like? Is such a thing even possible?

Those same questions bothered Gawker’s Adrian Chen enough that he took to Reddit this afternoon to ask users directly: “This is a nice sentiment but I’m curious what measures, if anything, administrators are taking to make sure this doesn’t happen again?” The responses so far are almost uniformly defensive. Several imply that Chen lacks the standing to render ethical judgments. But it’s a valid question, no matter who’s asking it. I’ve emailed Martin for his thoughts and will update if he writes back.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

TODAY IN SLATE

Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

Chief Justice John Roberts Says $1,000 Can’t Buy Influence in Congress. Looks Like He’s Wrong.

After This Merger, One Company Could Control One-Third of the Planet's Beer Sales

Hidden Messages in Corporate Logos

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

How Can We Investigate Potential Dangers of Fracking Without Being Alarmist?

My Year as an Abortion Doula       

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 16 2014 9:22 AM The Most Populist Campaign of 2014
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 15 2014 7:27 PM Could IUDs Be the Next Great Weapon in the Battle Against Poverty?
  Life
Atlas Obscura
Sept. 16 2014 8:00 AM The Wall Street Bombing: Low-Tech Terrorism in Prohibition-era New York
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 9:13 AM Clive James, Terminally Ill, Has Written an Exquisitely Resigned Farewell Poem
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 7:36 AM The Inspiration Drought Why our science fiction needs new dreams.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 16 2014 7:30 AM A Galaxy of Tatooines
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.