Facebook's Cute New Emoticons Are a Fiendish Plot. Don't Fall For It.

Future Tense
The Citizen's Guide to the Future
April 10 2013 1:34 PM

Facebook's Cute New Emoticons Are a Fiendish Plot. Don't Fall For It.

Facebook emoji: What are you doing?
Facebook wants to know exactly what you're doing, and it wants you to explain it in a way that its computers can understand. Solution: cute emoji!

Screenshot / Facebook

Facebook is rolling out a new feature that looks like a whimsical blast of 1990s nostalgia. Starting with a limited number of U.S. users, the site is encouraging people to share how they’re feeling or what they’re doing by selecting from a drop-down menu of emoji and other icons. The initial prompt looks like this:

Will Oremus Will Oremus

Will Oremus is Slate's senior technology writer.

Facebook: "What are you doing?"

Screenshot / Facebook

The image at the top of this post shows the drop-down menu, complete with helpful suggestions for what specifically you might be feeling, watching, or drinking at the moment. And here's the result:

Facebook emoji: "Meh"

Screenshot / Facebook

But you’re by no means limited to the vague and innocuous options Facebook suggests for you. When I start to type in the name of my favorite bourbon, Facebook is savvy enough to guess the brand I’m referring to and propose that as the top option in the drop-down menu. Now my status update links directly to the Facebook page for Pappy Van Winkle.

Facebook emoji links to Pappy Van Winkle's Facebook page

Screenshot / Facebook


As I said, the emoticons at first glance look like a frivolous throwback to the era of AIM, ICQ, and MySpace. But by now it should be clear that there’s more to them than meets the eye. As Josh Constine recognized when Facebook first tested the feature in January: “By selecting your current activity instead of merely writing it out, you structure data for Facebook.” He explained:

If you choose a particular pre-formatted emotion, piece of media, or food, Facebook could potentially use that behavior to pinpoint you with ads. If you listen to a Daft Punk song, it could target you with ads for their new album or [a] nearby concert. Coffee shops might be able to pay to reach coffee drinkers, and Netflix would probably love to target sad users who could be primed to stay home and watch some videos. Going further, Facebook could even sell “Sponsored Activities,” where advertisers could pay to have themselves suggested as what someone was up to in the category selector.

In theory, Facebook could try to derive the same information from your plain-English status updates by running them through natural-language processing algorithms. But turning informal, colloquial language into usable data is really hard. Even the smartest computers today are terrible at detecting irony, interpreting slang, or drawing inferences about people’s mental states based on their words. Google has some of its best minds working on that problem, and Facebook is clearly working on it too. But emoticons, along with hashtags, photo tags, "about" pages, and even the ubiquitous “like” button, appear to be part of a grand Facebook strategy to get its users to do a lot of the hard work themselves.

Of course, that’s not how Facebook is framing the feature. When I emailed the company for comment, a spokesman replied:

It is a new, more visual way for people to share how they're feeling and what they're doing in a status update. Now, you can easily add your current mood, what you're listening to, reading, watching, eating, or drinking to your status update right from the new smiley face icon in the composer.

He added that the information contained in the emoticons is “not searchable in Graph Search at this time.” And Facebook told Constine in January that it wasn’t yet feeding the data into its ad engine. But it’s a safe bet that it will, provided the feature catches on. And then you’ll have what amounts to an extra privacy decision with each status update: Use the emoticons and gift-wrap your message for the data-miners, or stick to plain English and limit your audience to humans.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.



The Ebola Story

How our minds build narratives out of disaster.

The Budget Disaster That Completely Sabotaged the WHO’s Response to Ebola

PowerPoint Is the Worst, and Now It’s the Latest Way to Hack Into Your Computer

The Shooting Tragedies That Forged Canada’s Gun Politics

A Highly Unscientific Ranking of Crazy-Old German Beers


Welcome to 13th Grade!

Some high schools are offering a fifth year. That’s a great idea.


The Actual World

“Mount Thoreau” and the naming of things in the wilderness.

Want Kids to Delay Sex? Let Planned Parenthood Teach Them Sex Ed.

Would You Trust Walmart to Provide Your Health Care? (You Should.)

  News & Politics
Oct. 22 2014 9:42 PM Landslide Landrieu Can the Louisiana Democrat use the powers of incumbency to save herself one more time?
Continuously Operating
Oct. 22 2014 2:38 PM Crack Open an Old One A highly unscientific evaluation of Germany’s oldest breweries.
Dear Prudence
Oct. 23 2014 6:00 AM Monster Kids from poorer neighborhoods keep coming to trick-or-treat in mine. Do I have to give them candy?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 23 2014 8:51 AM The Male-Dominated Culture of Business in Tech Is Not Great for Women
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Oct. 22 2014 5:27 PM The Slate Walking Dead Podcast A spoiler-filled discussion of Episodes 1 and 2.
Brow Beat
Oct. 23 2014 9:00 AM Exclusive Premiere: Key & Peele Imagines the Dark Side of the Make-A-Wish Program
Future Tense
Oct. 22 2014 5:33 PM One More Reason Not to Use PowerPoint: It’s The Gateway for a Serious Windows Vulnerability
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Oct. 23 2014 7:30 AM Our Solar System and Galaxy … Seen by an Astronaut
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.