Instagram rose to fame and fortune as a mobile app. That it was only accessible to those who downloaded it on their phones was no doubt part of what made its predominantly young users feel like it was a community of their own. (Everyone knows mom and dad only know how to use the Internet on their computers.)
Since becoming part of the Facebook family, the prototypical "mobile-only" startup has outgrown that limitation. Last year it rolled out "photo pages" and then Web profiles. Today, it announced that it will finally offer access to your photo feed via the website as well. That means that you can now do pretty much everything on Instagram.com that you can do on the mobile app—except take or upload a photo.
That and filters are among the few remaining distinctions between the features available on Instagram and those offered through Facebook, which released its own mobile camera app last spring. As I reported last week, Facebook is fast becoming a mobile-first company in its own right, with more users now reaching it via mobile devices than via the Web.
Instagram's further colonization of the Web should reinforce its ascent to mainstream status. But as the once-trendy startup's convergence with its parent company continues, people—especially the young and reckless—may start to question its raison d'etre.
TODAY IN SLATE
I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.
Republicans Like Scott Walker Are Building Campaigns Around Problems That Don’t Exist
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter
The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge
Iran and the U.S. Are Allies
They just aren’t ready to admit it yet.
Giving Up on Goodell
How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.