It’s Not the End of the World as We Know It. But Admit It—You’re a Tiny Bit Worried.

Future Tense
The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Dec. 19 2012 4:04 PM

It’s Not the End of the World as We Know It. But Admit It—You’re a Tiny Bit Worried.

158535694
A parrot is near a Mayan structure in the Copán Arqueological Park in Honduras.

Photo by ORLANDO SIERRA/AFP/Getty Images

There is no chance the world will end on Dec. 21. As my Slate colleague Phil Plait has written persuasively on “Bad Astronomy,” notions that the Earth’s poles will reverse, or a heretofore undiscovered planet will collide with ours, or solar flares will wreak havoc are “nonsense, garbage, taurine feces, flim flam, and pifflery.” The Maya never said that there would be an apocalypse on that particular date—and even if they did, there’d be no reason to believe them. We will all live to see another day (except, of course, for those of us who would have died anyway), so don’t put off your Christmas shopping or your credit card payments.

Torie Bosch Torie Bosch

Torie Bosch is the editor of Future Tense, a project of Slate, the New America Foundation, and Arizona State that looks at the implications of new technologies. 

According to a Reuters poll conducted in May, about 10 percent of people worldwide think that Dec. 21 could be doomsday. (To be fair, some apocalypse believers don’t think the world will necessarily end. They argue that we could face some sort of age of enlightenment or other major event—fuzzy predictions to save face when Dec. 22 dawns uneventfully.) If you aren’t part of the 10 percent, the Mayan apocalypse talk is quite entertaining: People are making fun of the Chicken Littles, finding ways to profit, and enjoying apocalypse theme parties—virgin sacrifice optional

Advertisement

But though Plait, NASA, other experts, and plain old common sense have me solidly convinced that there is no reason to believe the Dec. 21 hype, there’s a tiny, primitive part of me that has a twinge of fear. It’s illogical. It’s barely present. The skeptical, logical part of me disdains it. But it persists. Why?

According to Shmuel Lissek, an assistant professor of clinical psychology at the University of Minnesota who studies the psychophysiology and neurobiology of fear, evolution is to blame. In humanity’s early days, he says, “fear protected us from survival threats, and in our evolutionary history, the cost of missing a threat is much more expensive than the cost of a false alarm. … Essentially we’ve been naturally selected to be rather safe than sorry.” In cases like this, we’re torn between the primitive parts of our brain, which react quickly to any potential danger we see or hear about, and the evolved, which process the words, sounds, or images from a logical standpoint. If you know intellectually that Planet X isn’t going to slam into Earth on Dec. 21, but your heart rate elevates ever so slightly at the thought, you’re experiencing this conflict. The Mayan apocalypse may not be a stick in the forest that looks like a snake at first glance. In both cases, though, it’s better to be on alert, just in case.

That makes sense. But maybe there’s another explanation. I think it’s a bit like watching a horror movie—you know the action isn’t real, but you still experience some apprehension in a pleasurable, entertaining way. Though it won’t come to fruition, the thought of life ending or changing drastically adds a little suspense and excitement to the everyday. It’s something else to talk about and to distract us from more realistic but less extraordinary fears. You can envision these days as the first act in a post-apocalyptic movie. (Of course, if this were a film, my cavalier attitude would doom me to a gory death within five minutes of the cataclysmic event.)

But there are people for whom Dec. 21 is genuinely scary, not funhouse-scary, and I don’t want to diminish the anguish this has caused them. NASA’s David Morrison, an astrophysicist, has said that he’s received emails from people driven to suicidal thoughts by the prospect of the Mayan apocalypse. For their sake, it’s a relief that the end of fear of the end is nigh.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

TODAY IN SLATE

Justice Ginsburg’s Crucial Dissent in the Texas Voter ID Case

The Jarring Experience of Watching White Americans Speak Frankly About Race

Here’s Just How Far a Southern Woman May Have to Drive to Get an Abortion

The Most Ingenious Teaching Device Ever Invented

Marvel’s Civil War Is a Far-Right Paranoid Fantasy

It’s also a mess. Can the movies do better?

Behold

Sprawl, Decadence, and Environmental Ruin in Nevada

Space: The Next Generation

An All-Female Mission to Mars

As a NASA guinea pig, I verified that women would be cheaper to launch than men.

Watching Netflix in Bed. Hanging Bananas. Is There Anything These Hooks Can’t Solve?

The 2014 Kansas City Royals Show the Value of Building a Mediocre Baseball Team

  News & Politics
The World
Oct. 20 2014 1:50 PM Why We Shouldn’t be Too Sure About the Supposed Deal to Return the Abducted Nigerian Schoolgirls
  Business
Moneybox
Oct. 20 2014 12:37 PM The Fed Will Probably Stop Injecting Huge Sums of Money Into the Economy This Month
  Life
Atlas Obscura
Oct. 20 2014 1:43 PM Chouara: A Striking 11th-Century Tannery in Morocco
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 20 2014 1:10 PM Women Are Still Losing Jobs for Getting Pregnant
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Oct. 20 2014 7:15 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 9 A spoiler-filled discussion of "Flatline."
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 20 2014 1:26 PM This $248 Denim Jumpsuit Is the Latest Example of a Horrible Fashion Tradition
  Technology
Future Tense
Oct. 20 2014 1:51 PM Will Amazon Lead Us to the Golden Age of Books? A Future Tense Event.
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Oct. 20 2014 11:46 AM Is Anybody Watching My Do-Gooding? The difference between being a hero and being an altruist.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 10:23 AM Where I Was Wrong About the Royals I underestimated the value of building a team that’s just barely better than mediocre.