For Violating Users' Privacy, Google Pays FTC Fine of Approximately 0 Percent of Revenues

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Aug. 9 2012 2:14 PM

For Violating Users' Privacy, Google Pays FTC Fine of Approximately 0 Percent of Revenues

Eric Schmidt
Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt at an antitrust hearing in 2011.

Photo by Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

To the Federal Trade Commission, it’s an unprecedented crackdown and proof that the federal government won’t tolerate big Internet companies toying with Americans’ online privacy.

Will Oremus Will Oremus

Will Oremus is Slate's senior technology writer.

To Google, of course, it’s pocket change.


The FTC today confirmed earlier reports that Google has agreed to pay $22.5 million to settle charges that it misled users of Apple’s Safari browsers about how it was tracking them. Safari’s default privacy settings prevent sites from installing cookies that track users’ online activity in order to serve them personalized advertisements. But that’s how Google makes its billions, so it went ahead and secretly tracked them anyway.

Now it is paying the price. And the price, it turns out, equates to less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the company’s annual revenues—or roughly the amount of money the Mountain View colossus rakes in every few hours.

“The record-setting penalty in this matter sends a clear message to all companies under an FTC privacy order,” proclaimed FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. “No matter how big or small, all companies must abide by FTC orders against them and keep their privacy promises to consumers, or they will end up paying many times what it would have cost to comply in the first place.”

In fact, Google's penalty is equivalent to a $25 fine for someone making $50,000 a year. That’s about half the cost of your average parking ticket.

And that’s the bad news for Google in this settlement. The good news is that it doesn’t have to admit any wrongdoing, a concession that one dissenting FTC commissioner called “inexplicable.”

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

Yes, Black Families Tend to Spank More. That Doesn’t Mean It’s Good for Black Kids.

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge


The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 6:23 PM Bryan Cranston Reenacts Baseball’s Best Moments to Promote the Upcoming Postseason
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.