On Monday, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., spoke forcefully against cybersecurity legislation that, he says, violate Internet users’ privacy. The 12-minute speech encapsulates many arguments against CISPA and similar bills: Both CISPA and its Senate equivalent, he says, “subordinate all existing privacy rules and constitutional principles to the poorly defined interest of ‘cyber-security.’ ” He also warns of a “dystopian world where law enforcement evaluates your Internet activity for the potential that you might commit a crime.”
Cybersecurity is important, he emphasizes, but current proposals go well beyond what is necessary—and it’s possible to craft legislation that both secures the digital ecosystem while safeguarding privacy. “Bad Internet policy,” he says, “is increasingly premised on false choices.”
TODAY IN SLATE
More Than Scottish Pride
Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself.
What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows
Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?
The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.
Happy Constitution Day!
Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.