In December, the science community was in something of an uproar over controversial research into the transmission of avian flu, or A/H5N1, between mammals. Concerned that the results could be used to create a biological weapon or might accidentally spark a pandemic, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity encouraged the authors of two studies to keep parts of their data inaccessible to the general public. The recommendation—which was not legal binding—spurred a contentious debate over “dual use” research that could enrich knowledge, but also could be dangerous.
Now the advisory board has given new insight to its recommendations. In a commentary (PDF) published in Science magazine, the board declares that this is a watershed moment for the life sciences, as techniques become increasingly sophisticated and policy struggles to keep up. According to the board:
The life sciences have reached a crossroads. The direction we choose and the process by which we arrive at this decision must be undertaken as a community and not relegated to small segments of government, the scientific community, or society. Physicists faced a similar situation in the 1940s with nuclear weapons research, and it is inevitable that other scientific disciplines will also do so.
The board draws a further parallel to the 1970s, when research into recombinant DNA technologies hit prime time.
Read more on Science.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Democrats’ War at Home
How can the president’s party defend itself from the president’s foreign policy blunders?
Secret Service Director Julia Pierson Resigns
Piper Kerman on Why She Dressed Like a Hitchcock Heroine for Her Prison Sentencing
Windows 8 Was So Bad That Microsoft Will Skip Straight to Windows 10
Homeland Is Good Again! For Now.
Cringing. Ducking. Mumbling.
How GOP candidates react whenever someone brings up reproductive rights or gay marriage.
How Even an Old Hipster Can Age Gracefully
On their new albums, Leonard Cohen, Robert Plant, and Loudon Wainwright III show three ways.