“Digital DNA” Plan To Thwart SAT Cheating Wouldn’t Actually Collect Students’ Genetic Material

Future Tense
The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Jan. 24 2012 11:38 AM

“Digital DNA” Plan To Thwart SAT Cheating Wouldn’t Actually Collect Students’ Genetic Material

A student checks her answering paper before taking the College Scholastic Ability Test, a standardized exam for college entrance, at a high school in Seoul, 15 November 2007.

Photo by LEE JONG-DUCK/AFP/Getty Images

Last night, New York’s CBS 2 aired a report about a proposed plan to make the SAT and ACT exams imposter-proof using “digital DNA.” Today, the company behind the scheme, Applied DNA Sciences, will present its technology to legislators in New York state. Presumably, Applied DNA Sciences hopes the state will invest in its system in hopes of thwarting enterprising students hoping to copy the Long Island teenager who allegedly made thousands of dollars taking the SAT for at least 15 of his classmates.

The TV segment and accompanying article on this “digital DNA” have riled some civil libertarians worried about any plan to collect students’ genetic information; for instance, Anonymous tweeted to its more than 400,000 followers, “Hello 1984!” Others are riled up by the idea that the SATs would receive biometric security measures, while voting would not.


One problem with the backlash: There’s no human DNA in the proposed “digital DNA system.” Rather, students would be issued ID cards that contain plant DNA, which is what Applied DNA Sciences claims makes them counterfeit-proof. This important point isn’t at all clear in CBS 2’s confusing Web article or segment. (In a demonstration of their unfamiliarity with this technology, the site stylized a reference to the cloud as “the ‘CLOUD.’ “) Furthermore, CBS 2 doesn’t mention that the scientist interviewed for the report is the CEO of Applied DNA Sciences and therefore has a financial interest in the technology.

This is how people end up fearing new technologies.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Torie Bosch is the editor of Future Tense, a project of Slate, the New America Foundation, and Arizona State that looks at the implications of new technologies. 


Justice Ginsburg’s Crucial Dissent in the Texas Voter ID Case

The Jarring Experience of Watching White Americans Speak Frankly About Race

How Facebook’s New Feature Could Come in Handy During a Disaster

The Most Ingenious Teaching Device Ever Invented

Sprawl, Decadence, and Environmental Ruin in Nevada

View From Chicago

You Should Be Able to Sell Your Kidney

Or at least trade it for something.

Space: The Next Generation

An All-Female Mission to Mars

As a NASA guinea pig, I verified that women would be cheaper to launch than men.

Terrorism, Immigration, and Ebola Are Combining Into a Supercluster of Anxiety

The Legal Loophole That Allows Microsoft to Seize Assets and Shut Down Companies

  News & Politics
Oct. 19 2014 1:05 PM Dawn Patrol Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s critically important 5 a.m. wake-up call on voting rights.
Business Insider
Oct. 19 2014 11:40 AM Pot-Infused Halloween Candy Is a Worry in Colorado
Oct. 17 2014 5:26 PM Judge Begrudgingly Strikes Down Wyoming’s Gay Marriage Ban
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 17 2014 4:23 PM A Former FBI Agent On Why It’s So Hard to Prosecute Gamergate Trolls
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Oct. 20 2014 7:15 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 9 A spoiler-filled discussion of "Flatline."
Oct. 19 2014 4:33 PM Building Family Relationships in and out of Juvenile Detention Centers
Future Tense
Oct. 17 2014 6:05 PM There Is No Better Use For Drones Than Star Wars Reenactments
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Oct. 20 2014 7:00 AM Gallery: The Red Planet and the Comet
Sports Nut
Oct. 16 2014 2:03 PM Oh What a Relief It Is How the rise of the bullpen has changed baseball.