Has Geoengineering’s Moment Finally Arrived?

The Citizen's Guide to the Future
Oct. 4 2011 11:08 AM

Has Geoengineering’s Moment Finally Arrived?


Photo by Spencer Weiner/Getty Images

We’re not quite ready to hack the atmosphere. But a real conversation about geoengineering may be on the horizon. The Bipartisan Policy Center’s Task Force on Climate Remediation Research has released a report (PDF) that strongly urges the U.S. government to embark on serious study and thought about using geoengineering to combat global warming. “The task force believes the federal government should embark on a focused and systematic program of research into climate remediation,” says the report. The task force recommends that the effort be directed by the White House Office on Science and Technology Policy, with the Office of Management and Budget, beginning with funding for fiscal year 2013. One semantic note: Rather than use the term “geoengineering,” which it deems “broad and imprecise,” the task force prefers “climate remediation.”

The report is cautious and repeatedly emphasizes that this is an attempt to start a genuine dialogue (something Jeff Goodell also argued for last year in Slate), rather than a support statement for geoengineering as a climate-change fix. Says the New York Times, “In interviews, panelists said again and again that the continuing focus of policy makers and experts should be on reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. But several acknowledged that significant action remained a political nonstarter.”  


Over on the Atlantic, Rebecca J. Rosen poses another question about geoengineering: What if it works? By its very nature, geoengineering would have uneven effects around the globe; some countries could unleash climate-remediation technology without consideration for how it would influence other nations. “[W[e have to wrestle with the possibility that the ability to control the weather is a power so massive that our international political system could not cope with it,” Rosen writes.

Read more on the New York Times and the Atlantic.

Future Tense is a partnership of SlateNew America, and Arizona State University.

Torie Bosch is the editor of Future Tense, a project of Slate, the New America Foundation, and Arizona State that looks at the implications of new technologies. 



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.


Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 16 2014 11:46 PM The Scariest Campfire Story More horrifying than bears, snakes, or hook-handed killers.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.