Justice Scalia on Well-Written Briefs

Slate's blog on legal issues.
April 1 2008 2:44 AM

Justice Scalia on Well-Written Briefs

Like a fair number of other people , I'm completely captivated by Bryan Garner's videotaped interviews with Supreme Court justices on effective brief-writing.  There's no shortage of insights to be gleaned from these discussions -- particularly from the Chief Justice.  Of all of the interviews, however, Justice Scalia best summarized what's at stake in brief-writing with an anecdote from his D.C. Circuit days (roughly three and a half minutes into his first interview segment ):

Let me say first of all how important lawyers' briefs are.  One of the happiest events of my life was when I was sitting on the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, we had a lot of administrative law cases, which tended to be long cases with many briefs, and I remember one case we had, involving standards for automobiles.  And there were a lot of intervenors and amici and what-not, and I read brief after brief, and I was really getting pretty punchy.  

And I picked up this one brief, and all of a sudden it really captured my attention: Everything was so felicitously put, it was elegant, it was crisp, you could see where the writer was going.  

And I said, who wrote this brief?   And I turned over the front and it made me so happy to see that it was one of the best lawyers in Washington.  And it made me very happy to know that you can tell the difference, you can really tell the difference.

(From what I can tell, he's referring to Center for Auto Safety v. Peck , 751 F.2d 1336 (D.C. Cir. 1985).  I won't try to guess which brief was his favorite.)

Brief-writing is the most-enjoyable part of my enjoyable job.  What I wouldn't give to someday write briefs that impress judges as much as the unnamed intervenor's brief impressed then-Judge Scalia.

A Side Note:   Justice Scalia and his interrogator, Bryan Garner, are collaborating on a book on effective advocacy: Making Your Case .



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.


Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 16 2014 11:46 PM The Scariest Campfire Story More horrifying than bears, snakes, or hook-handed killers.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.