.He wants to know what I would tell judges about how to decide casesconsistent with my views of the living constitution. As describedearlier, I think that living constitutionalism is
a theory about the legitimacy of the constitutional system as a whole
rather than a theory that secures legitimacy
by instructing judges to decide cases this way rather than that way
.But Eric is certainly right that this emphasis does not exclude thepossibility of giving judges general forms of advice as participants inthe legal system. It's just that I don't think this sort of advice doesmuch good for judges who are already well socialized into themainstream of legal culture, and these are about the only sort ofpeople who tend to get positions as judges in the first place. But Ericwill not be denied: he wants an answer, so I guess I have to give him
Nevertheless,I should warn him that my advice for judges is, I fear, rather boringand humdrum; worse yet, I doubt it will help any judge decide anydifficult case, for it will prove indeterminate in a wide variety ofsituations. I do wonder whether it will satisfy Eric:
TODAY IN SLATE
Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS
But the next president might.
IOS 8 Comes Out Today. Do Not Put It on Your iPhone 4S.
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?
Here are the facts.
Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows
The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything
It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.
- German Fraud Investigator Says Anonymous Client Will Pay $30 Million for Info on MH17 Shootdown
- A Brief Reminder That Not Everything in the World is Terrible
- How Many Countries Were Created Through Secession Votes?
- Gun-Control Group Investigates 81 People Looking for Guns Online, Finds Eight Have Criminal Records