Binary Executive—Take II

Slate's blog on legal issues.
March 20 2008 9:43 AM

Binary Executive—Take II

[David Barron] 

By noting the vice president's surprising comfort level with his own independence as I did in an earlier post on the Binary Executive I did not mean to argue Cheney was acting illegally by striking out on his own. My point was to highlight the hypocrisy of it all. If even Mr. Unitary Executive is comfortable with asserting his independent authority as a "sometime" member of the executive branch, then shouldn't we question whether a unitary command structure is as imperative as unitarians often claim?


Obviously, the veep is a complex office. It is truly a mix of the branches. But unitarian doctrine can't handle that kind of complexity. 

Consider the puzzles that it raises:

1. How can the veep play a direct role in making executive war policy? After all, the D.C. Circuit has held that legislative agents can't sit as nonvoting ex-office members of the Federal Elections Commission. Even that minimal participation, that court  has said in a paradigm of unitarian reasoning, smacks of inappropriate legislative aggrandizement. How much worse, then, for the Senate's president to be telling the CIA what to do!?

2. Why should the veep get the benefit of the president's constitutional power to make recommendations to Congress, as Cheney argued he should in fine Unitarian fashion, in objecting to requests to disclose information concerning his energy task force. After all, as a member of Congress, isn't he supposed to receive recommendations rather than make them?

Suffice it to say, then, that, as Adam says, the veep is a hybrid and a hybrid that the Constitution tolerates. But isn't that instructive of a more general point about the Constitution?

If our constitutional system can tolerate this kind of complex blending at the very highest levels of the executive branch, then why should we think it seeks to stamp out similar configurations lower down the chain of command. So the next time a unitarian tells you the JAGs in the military, civil rights lawyers in Justice, or scientists throughout the government have no right to assert their independence, remember they're only following Cheney's lead.  



The Irritating Confidante

John Dickerson on Ben Bradlee’s fascinating relationship with John F. Kennedy.

My Father Invented Social Networking at a Girls’ Reform School in the 1930s

Renée Zellweger’s New Face Is Too Real

Sleater-Kinney Was Once America’s Best Rock Band

Can it be again?

The All The President’s Men Scene That Captured Ben Bradlee

Medical Examiner

Is It Better to Be a Hero Like Batman?

Or an altruist like Bruce Wayne?


Driving in Circles

The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.

The World’s Human Rights Violators Are Signatories on the World’s Human Rights Treaties

How Punctual Are Germans?

  News & Politics
Oct. 22 2014 12:44 AM We Need More Ben Bradlees His relationship with John F. Kennedy shows what’s missing from today’s Washington journalism.
Oct. 21 2014 5:57 PM Soda and Fries Have Lost Their Charm for Both Consumers and Investors
The Vault
Oct. 21 2014 2:23 PM A Data-Packed Map of American Immigration in 1903
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 21 2014 3:03 PM Renée Zellweger’s New Face Is Too Real
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Oct. 21 2014 1:02 PM Where Are Slate Plus Members From? This Weird Cartogram Explains. A weird-looking cartogram of Slate Plus memberships by state.
Brow Beat
Oct. 21 2014 9:42 PM The All The President’s Men Scene That Perfectly Captured Ben Bradlee’s Genius
Oct. 21 2014 11:44 PM Driving in Circles The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.
  Health & Science
Climate Desk
Oct. 21 2014 11:53 AM Taking Research for Granted Texas Republican Lamar Smith continues his crusade against independence in science.
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.