Binary Executive -- Answering David's Questions

Slate's blog on legal issues.
March 20 2008 10:48 PM

Binary Executive -- Answering David's Questions

David continued the conversation on the compatibility of Cheney's assertion that the Vice President is not part of the Executive Branch and his support for the theory of the Unitary Executive by posing a couple of questions.  Given that I've done my best to show the theoretical consistency of those positions, I'll take a crack at responding.

David, you first suggest that if the Vice President is part of the legislative branch, then his participation in executive branch affairs would seem to run afoul of the Supreme Court's stance against congressional encroachment on executive power.  I think you overlook a pretty important distinction:

Advertisement

In the Supreme Court's cases (and in the D.C. Circuit decision you mentioned, FEC v. NRA Political Victory Fund , 6 F.3d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1993)), the courts stood athwart congressional attempts to "aggrandize" power not afforded Congress by the Constitution.  In NRA Political Victory Fund , the D.C. Circuit went so far as to state (without offering any on-point citation) that "the mere presence of agents of Congress on an entity with executive powers offends the Constitution."

Even assuming that the D.C. Circuit's statement can be taken as being co-extensive with the Supreme Court's precedents (I think the D.C. Circuit's statement is a bit more aggressive), Vice Presidential participation at the invitation of the President seems to me not to raise the red flags identified in the case law.  A Vice President's ad hoc participation in formulation of Administration policy occurs only where the President allows it.  Thus, the President's invitation to the Vice President to participate in Administration policymaking involves no threat of congressional "encroachment" on the executive -- the executive remains in full control of the arrangement! 

Similarly, where the D.C. Circuit warned (with respect to ex officio congressional members on the FEC) that "their mere presence as agents of Congress conveys a tacit message to the other commissioners," Vice Presidential involvement in Administration policymaking deliberations raise no such concerns.  In such cases, the Vice President isn't acting "as [an] agent[] of Congress" -- he's acting as an agent of the President!

Your second question asked how the Vice President, if a member of the Legislative Branch, could refuse to disclose information to Congress (your case in point: the Cheney Energy Task Force).  My answer here is similar to my answer to your first question: for purposes of Presidential privilege and confidentiality, the important question is not whether the Vice President enjoys the privilege, but whether the President enjoys the privilege, and whether the vice-presidential communications were undertaken for the purpose of collecting and conveying to the President information for the President's decision-making process.  The fact that a member of the legislative branch is a party to confidential policy meetings convened for the purpose of providing advice to the President does not -- so far as I know -- defeat the privilege.  (On that point, though, I'm happy to be corrected.)

Finally, a clarification:  You and I disagree slightly on the Vice President's constitutional pedigree:  You say that his office "is truly a mix of the branches," but my hypothesis has been that his office is just part of the Legislative Branch.  Maybe that's why, contrary to your point, I'm a "Unitarian" who feels comfortable with the Vice President's "complex" nature. 

TODAY IN SLATE

The World

How Canada’s Shooting Tragedies Have Shaped Its Gun Control Politics

Where Ebola Lives Between Outbreaks

Gunman Killed Inside Canadian Parliament; Soldier Shot at National Monument Dies

Sleater-Kinney Was Once America’s Best Rock Band

Can it be again?

Paul Farmer: Up to 90 Percent of Ebola Patients Should Survive

Is he right?

Science

“I’m Not a Scientist” Is No Excuse

Politicians brag about their ignorance while making ignorant decisions.

Technology

Driving in Circles

The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.

In Praise of 13th Grade: Why a Fifth Year of High School Is a Great Idea 

PowerPoint Is the Worst, and Now It’s the Latest Way to Hack Into Your Computer

  News & Politics
Politics
Oct. 22 2014 9:42 PM Landslide Landrieu Can the Louisiana Democrat use the powers of incumbency to save herself one more time?
  Business
Continuously Operating
Oct. 22 2014 2:38 PM Crack Open an Old One A highly unscientific evaluation of Germany’s oldest breweries.
  Life
Gentleman Scholar
Oct. 22 2014 5:54 PM May I Offer to Sharpen My Friends’ Knives? Or would that be rude?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 22 2014 4:27 PM Three Ways Your Text Messages Change After You Get Married
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Oct. 22 2014 5:27 PM The Slate Walking Dead Podcast A spoiler-filled discussion of Episodes 1 and 2.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 22 2014 10:39 PM Avengers: Age of Ultron Looks Like a Fun, Sprawling, and Extremely Satisfying Sequel
  Technology
Future Tense
Oct. 22 2014 5:33 PM One More Reason Not to Use PowerPoint: It’s The Gateway for a Serious Windows Vulnerability
  Health & Science
Wild Things
Oct. 22 2014 2:42 PM Orcas, Via Drone, for the First Time Ever
  Sports
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.
The World
Oct. 22 2014 6:30 PMThe Tragedies That Have Shaped Canada's Gun Politics
Technology
Oct. 21 2014 11:44 PMDriving in CirclesThe autonomous Google car may never actually happen.
Culturebox
Oct. 20 2014 3:22 PMNow Is the Time to InventThe legacy (and the return) of Sleater-Kinney, which was once the best rock band in America.