Binary Executive Redux

Slate's blog on legal issues.
March 17 2008 3:05 PM

Binary Executive Redux

[David Barron] 

By noting the Vice President's surprising comfort level with his own independence - as I did in an earlier post on the Binary Executive - I did not mean to argue Cheney was acting illegally by striking out on his own.  My point was to highlight the hypocrisy of it all.  If even Mr. Unitary Executive is comfortable with asserting his independent authority as a (sometime) member of the executive branch, then shouldn't we question whether a unitary command structure is as imperative as unitarians often claim?


Obviously, the Veep is a complex office.  It is truly a mix of the branches.  But unitarian doctrine can't handle that kind of complexity. 

Consider the puzzles that it raises:

1.  How can the Veep play a direct role in making executive war policy?  After all, the D.C. Circuit has held that legislative agents can't sit as non-voting ex office members of the Federal Elections Commission.  Even that minimal participation, that court has said in a paradigm of Unitarian reasoning, smacks of inappropriate legislative aggrandizement.  How much worse, then, for the Senate's President to be telling the CIA what to do!?

2.  Why should the Veep get the benefit of the President's constitutional power to make recommendations to Congress, as Cheney argued he should in fine Unitarian fashion in objecting to requests to disclose  information concerning his energy task force.   After all, as a member of Congress, isn't he supposed to receive recommendations rather than make them?

Suffice it to say, then, that, as Adam says, the Veep is a hybrid and a hybrid that the Constitution tolerates.  But isn't that instructive of a more general point about the Constitution?

If our constitutional system can tolerate this kind of complex blending at the very highest levels of the executive branch, then why should we think it seeks to stamp out similar configurations lower down the chain of command. So, the next time a Unitarian tells you the JAGs in the military, civil rights lawyers in Justice, or scientists throughout the government have no right to assert their independence, remember -- they're only following Cheney's lead.  



Scalia’s Liberal Streak

The conservative justice’s most brilliant—and surprisingly progressive—moments on the bench.

Colorado Is Ground Zero for the Fight Over Female Voters

There’s a Way to Keep Ex-Cons Out of Prison That Pays for Itself. Why Don’t More States Use It?

The NFL Explains How It Sees “the Role of the Female”

The Music Industry Is Ignoring Some of the Best Black Women Singing R&B


Theo’s Joint and Vanessa’s Whiskey

No sitcom did the “Very Special Episode” as well as The Cosby Show.


The Other Huxtable Effect

Thirty years ago, The Cosby Show gave us one of TV’s great feminists.

Cliff Huxtable Explains the World: Five Lessons From TV’s Greatest Dad

Why Television Needs a New Cosby Show Right Now

  News & Politics
Sept. 18 2014 8:20 PM A Clever Attempt at Explaining Away a Vote Against the Farm Bill
Sept. 18 2014 6:02 PM A Chinese Company Just Announced the Biggest IPO in U.S. History
The Slate Quiz
Sept. 18 2014 11:44 PM Play the Slate News Quiz With Jeopardy! superchampion Ken Jennings.
  Double X
Sept. 18 2014 8:07 PM Crying Rape False rape accusations exist, and they are a serious problem.
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Sept. 18 2014 1:23 PM “It’s Not Every Day That You Can Beat the World Champion” An exclusive interview with chess grandmaster Fabiano Caruana.
Brow Beat
Sept. 18 2014 4:33 PM The Top 5 Dadsplaining Moments From The Cosby Show
Future Tense
Sept. 18 2014 6:48 PM By 2100 the World's Population Could Be 11 Billion
  Health & Science
Sept. 18 2014 3:35 PM Do People Still Die of Rabies? And how do you know if an animal is rabid?
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.