No, FXX’s Cropping Is Not Ruining the Simpsons Marathon

Slate's Culture Blog
Aug. 27 2014 3:11 PM

No, FXX’s Cropping Is Not Ruining the Simpsons Marathon

Homer Simpson
Simpsons purists are literally angry with rage.

© 2013 Fox Broadcasting

If you’ve been anywhere near the Internet in the last few days, you’ve probably heard of the Great Simpsons Cropping Scandal. When FXX, in its supreme beneficence, brought the world a 12-day marathon of #EverySimpsonsEver, it seemed like nothing could possib-lie go wrong. But lo, though the network gives, it also takes away. More specifically, it has taken away about 25 percent of every frame of the show’s first 19 seasons. By airing episodes originally created for standard definition 4:3 screens by zooming and cropping them into wider and higher-definition 16:9 frames (rather than presenting them with bars down each side of the screen), FXX committed what many media obsessives consider a cardinal sin: They altered the original content.

Since some of these technical changes—letterboxing vs. pillarboxing vs. panning and scanning—are easier to understand when you see them, I made a two-minute video to break it down:

Advertisement

To some Simpsons purists, this change has been nothing short of “blasphemous.” The Huffington Post claimed that FXX was “Ruining the Simpsons Marathon.” The Verge called the network’s decision “inexplicable,” while ScreenCrush called it “wrong-headed,” a “hack job,” and nothing short of a “horror.” Gizmodo, more bluntly, claimed that the episodes “look like ass.” Indiewire, at least demonstrating a sense of humor, pleaded, “Won’t someone think of the children?

But here’s the thing: The atrocities that crop-gate doomsayers have warned about have been vastly exaggerated.

For example, we were warned that this:

SimpsonsImage1

Would look like this:

SimpsonsImage2

But when this scene finally aired Tuesday morning, it actually looked like this:

SimpsonsImage4

Even seeing that this joke (in as much as it is one) was preserved, some would still call that last image a travesty. As New York magazine TV critic Matt Zoller Seitz summed up his views on Twitter, “altering a film or show’s compositions for any reason, at any time, is vandalism.”

If The Simpsons was Lawrence of Arabia, I might agree. But The Simpsons is now and has always been a TV show, its content intimately linked with its method of production, with jokes and stories negotiated at all points between the creators and networks, with the understanding that the show would be continually cut and altered to fit demands in syndication.

And, though some may dismiss the desires of the masses, studies have found that the vast majority of viewers prefer widescreen content. Call me a philistine, but sometimes I agree: I found myself genuinely excited to see what 25 years of The Simpsons looked liked optimized for 2014. FXX may have felt the same way. For a new network making a huge wager on the power of a legacy property to bolster its currently thin slate of programming, the decision to zoom and crop rather than pillarbox makes even the oldest episodes of the series visually consistent with the rest of network’s shows. Even if the network might have preferred to air the episodes in their original format, they must have known that they would receive even more complaints if they showed them with black bars down each side of the screen.

At the end of the day, FXX did not ruin The Simpsons. It aired one cut of one network’s version of a show that has seen many versions in many places. (Fans will have yet more options in the coming weeks: On FX’s own upcoming “Simpsons World” app, fans will be able to watch older episodes in original 4:3.) And I, for one, welcome our new widescreen Simpsons overlords.

As for the purists, they would do well to listen to the wisdom of Bart Simpson: Don’t have a cow, man.

Chris Wade is a video and podcast producer for Slate and occasional contributor to Brow Beat. Follow him on Twitter.

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge

Politics

The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.