Elmore Leonard’s Rules for Writing Are Full of Exceptions

Slate's Culture Blog
Aug. 20 2013 3:08 PM

Elmore Leonard’s Rules for Writing Are Full of Exceptions

74318638
Elmore Leonard

Photo by Vince Bucci/Getty Images

Elmore Leonard’s death this morning at age 87 has been greeted with a wave of online appreciation—for his great novels, his terrific movies, and his rules for writing. That last contribution of his, a collection of 10 rules that he first shared in 2001, has today been posted by Vulture, BuzzFeed, the Philadelphia Inquirer, Open Culture, and no doubt many other websites and publications. The rules have been popular for a decade and were even turned into a book. But they are full of exceptions.

And Leonard knew that as well as anyone: In the original New York Times article that includes the rules, Leonard himself adds caveats and qualifications to five of the 10—something you’ll miss if you just read the listicle versions proliferating on the Web. He even opens up the piece with a big hedge: “If you have a facility for language and imagery and the sound of your voice pleases you, invisibility is not what you are after, and you can skip the rules.” Now, saying you can skip the rules if “the sound of your voices pleases you” may sound like a jab at self-satisfied writers, and perhaps that’s how Leonard meant it. But the truth is that “invisibility” is not what all writers are after—and not, for that matter, what all writers should be after. And so I prefer to think that Leonard intended that bit about skipping the rules with at least some sincerity.

Advertisement

And he notes plenty of other exceptions as he goes. After the very first rule, for instance, “Never open a book with weather,” he adds, “There are exceptions. If you happen to be Barry Lopez, who has more ways to describe ice and snow than an Eskimo, you can do all the weather reporting you want.” Then after the second rule, “Avoid prologues,” he writes, “There is a prologue in John Steinbeck’s Sweet Thursday, but it’s OK because a character in the book makes the point of what my rules are all about.” After telling people to use exclamation points sparingly (rule No. 5), Leonard adds, “If you have the knack of playing with exclaimers the way Tom Wolfe does, you can throw them in by the handful.” In case you haven’t noticed a pattern yet, consider his caveat for rule No. 9, one of the most dubious, “Don’t go into great detail describing places and things,” to which he appends, “Unless you're Margaret Atwood and can paint scenes with language or write landscapes in the style of Jim Harrison.”

In other words: Don’t do these things, unless you’re good at them. Then go ahead. Which is actually, in itself, not terrible advice. Leonard’s rules are not so much rules for writing well as they are pointers for how you might avoid writing badly. That certainly describes some of the entries that appear without any exceptions, such as “Never use a verb other than ‘said’ to carry dialogue,” “Never use an adverb to modify the verb ‘said,’ ” and “Use regional dialect, patois, sparingly.” All of these things can be done with skill, but they can also go very wrong very easily. So most of us should probably avoid them altogether.

But writers who are after their own distinctive voices will have to forge ahead and try some of those things—and probably a few other risky techniques besides. And Leonard clearly appreciated those writers who had done so successfully. Towards the end of his original New York Times piece, he describes in more detail Steinbeck’s Sweet Thursday, in which one of the characters explains what Leonard’s “rules are all about.” That book contains two chapters called “Hooptedoodle 1” and “Hooptedoodle 2,” hooptedoodle being the character’s word for what happens when writers “spin up some pretty words maybe or sing a little song with language.” Leonard says those chapter titles, in his view, were Steinbeck’s way of telling readers they could skip those chapters if they wanted to. Then he quips: “Did I read the hooptedoodle chapters? Every word.”

David Haglund is a senior editor at Slate. He runs Brow Beat, Slate's culture blog.

TODAY IN SLATE

Medical Examiner

Here’s Where We Stand With Ebola

Even experienced international disaster responders are shocked at how bad it’s gotten.

Why Are Lighter-Skinned Latinos and Asians More Likely to Vote Republican?

A Woman Who Escaped the Extreme Babymaking Christian Fundamentalism of Quiverfull

The XX Factor
Sept. 22 2014 12:29 PM A Woman Who Escaped the Extreme Babymaking Christian Fundamentalism of Quiverfull

Subprime Loans Are Back

And believe it or not, that’s a good thing.

It Is Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice

Building a Better Workplace

In Defense of HR

Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.

How Ted Cruz and Scott Brown Misunderstand What It Means to Be an American Citizen

Divestment Is Fine but Mostly Symbolic. There’s a Better Way for Universities to Fight Climate Change.

  News & Politics
Politics
Sept. 22 2014 6:30 PM What Does It Mean to Be an American? Ted Cruz and Scott Brown think it’s about ideology. It’s really about culture.
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 22 2014 5:38 PM Apple Won't Shut Down Beats Music After All (But Will Probably Rename It)
  Life
Outward
Sept. 22 2014 4:45 PM Why Can’t the Census Count Gay Couples Accurately?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 22 2014 7:43 PM Emma Watson Threatened With Nude Photo Leak for Speaking Out About Women's Equality
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus
Sept. 22 2014 1:52 PM Tell Us What You Think About Slate Plus Help us improve our new membership program.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 22 2014 9:17 PM Trent Reznor’s Gone Girl Soundtrack Sounds Like an Eerie, Innovative Success
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 22 2014 6:27 PM Should We All Be Learning How to Type in Virtual Reality?
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 22 2014 4:34 PM Here’s Where We Stand With Ebola Even experienced international disaster responders are shocked at how bad it’s gotten.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.