What are the chances you’re reading this in the bathroom? Pretty good, apparently. Where else in this hectic world are you going to find the peace and quiet to read Slate, plan your social life, or check if you’re the first person to consider pitching a show called The Real Housewives of King’s Landing? (Damn.)
You’re especially likely to be in the bathroom if you’re an Android user, according to a 2012 study, which found that 87 percent of such people regularly engage in what’s been called “bogging,” compared with a mere 77 percent of iPhone users. (Got a better term than bogging for going online in the bathroom? Let me know in the comments.) Half of all water-damaged phones are damaged by, um, eau de toilette. I haven’t seen any data on what percentage of Americans clean their phones after bathroom usage—but a recent study concluded that 16 percent of our phones “have poop on them.”
Lovely. But where were we? That’s right: on the can. So, look down. Is the toilet seat U-shaped, like a horseshoe, with a gap in front? Or is it a continuous, O-shaped ring?
If you’re in a public restroom, the seat is probably U-shaped. If you’re enthroned at home, you’re probably on an O-shaped seat. As a reader—willing to be identified only as “Laurie from Edmonton” and reluctant to comment on the record about where she reads Slate—asked in a recent email, what’s the deal with the U-shaped ones?
Well, Laurie from Edmonton, there are many unsatisfying theories out there. Perhaps men are less careful in public toilets, “away from the restraining influence of their families,” some have said. The U-shaped seat might stay cleaner if the seat isn’t raised. (But who doesn’t raise the seat?) Maybe guys don’t want their business touching the seat away from home? But women’s restrooms have the same seats—and wouldn’t the same reluctance apply at home, albeit to a lesser degree? Perhaps people are (unnecessarily) afraid of catching STDs from public toilet seats. Or maybe U-shaped seats are somehow easier to clean. And then there’s the theory put forward by Pasha Malla at the Morning News: U-shaped seats use less material and so are cheaper to make and to clean.
Even Wikipedia is sending mixed signals. In the online encyclopedia’s tome on toilet seats, the subsection on open front toilet seats also mulls various theories, e.g., that the U-shaped seat is ergonomically better. (How exactly? It’s not clear, nor is there any explanation why the same logic wouldn’t apply to home seats.) The next section states point blank that the reason for the U-shaped seat is to reduce “spatter” and make cleaning easier.
None of these theories is quite right. The original purpose for the U-shaped seat, according to Lynne Simnick, senior director of code development at IAPMO—the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials—was to aid women. Simnick explains that the open seat was designed to allow women “to wipe the perineal area after using the water closet” without contacting a seat that might be unhygienic.
The U-shaped seat in public restrooms is a requirement of IAPMO’s Uniform Plumbing Code. On its own, the code doesn’t have any legal force, but city, country, and state governments do frequently adopt it (or a variation) as law. It currently applies, in some form, to more than half the population of the U.S. and the world. (Any readers living abroad who can weigh in on how common the U shape is overseas? Head to the comments.)
Simnick notes that while women were the originally intended beneficiaries of the U-shaped seat requirement, men also benefit. The design “eliminates an area that could be contaminated with urine” and also “eliminates the user’s genital contact with the seat.”
There is a sensible exception to the Uniform Plumbing Code requirement. If a public restroom has an automatic toilet-seat cover dispenser, the seat doesn’t need to be U-shaped.