Judd Apatow Edits Magazine, Puts His Movie on the Cover

Slate's Culture Blog
Dec. 7 2012 1:45 PM

Is There Anything Wrong With This Picture?

The new issue of Vanity Fair, edited by Judd Apatow, features the cast of his new movie on one of its three covers

The new issue of Vanity Fair, the magazine’s first-ever devoted solely to comedy, is terrific. The highlight is probably the interview with Mike Nichols and his one-time comedy partner Elaine May, who almost never gives interviews. (The wildly popular duo helped turn improv into the huge part of American comedy it has since become.) But it has plenty of competition: The conversation with Albert Brooks is great, and the oral history of Freaks and Geeks—which, unlike much of the issue, you can read online—is getting lots of much-deserved love on the web. There’s also a Martin Short profile, a story about the making of the Blues Brothers full of crazy Belushi anecdotes, a Proust Questionnaire filled out by Louis C.K., and more.  

So does it matter that Judd Apatow edited it? (He is the magazine’s third guest editor; Tom Ford oversaw the 2006 Hollywood issue—he had just recently formed a production company—and Bono edited the Africa issue, in 2007.) Obviously it matters in the sense that some (most?) of the issue’s great pieces probably would not have happened without him. He was the executive producer behind Freaks and Geeks, and just directed Albert Brooks in This Is 40, so he is uniquely well suited to getting those people to talk to the magazine. Of course, that also means he stands to financially benefit from positive coverage for those productions. (He did not, however, get paid for his work on the issue, apparently.) So is it a problem if he’s overseeing that coverage?

Perhaps not. There are no reviews in the issue; it is a mix of interviews, oral histories, and profiles. And a very informal survey of friends both inside and outside of journalism suggested that few people see anything wrong with Apatow editing such pieces. The question has not, so far as I can tell, been publicly raised before now. The issue was first announced back in October; at the time, Entertainment Weekly noted that, since Apatow is “the executive producer of HBO’s show Girlsit’s likely Lena Dunham will be making an appearance in Vanity Fair’s coverage.” (She does.) The person who wrote that sentence made no suggestion that there was anything untoward about it. And the rest of the world seems to agree.


Many magazines would probably not enter into such an arrangement. But Vanity Fair, which is perhaps best known for its lavish photo spreads and equally lavish Oscar party, does not present itself as a totally independent observer of celebrity culture, nor does it seem to be regarded as such by its readership. When I emailed its editor, Graydon Carter, about the matter, he was frank about the access that bringing Apatow aboard provided:

Apatow is one of the most relevant, inventive and funny directors working today. And it just so happens that comedy is having a moment and Judd is one of the figures that defines it. He provided access to a slew of talented people, both in and out of his own sphere, and he worked hard and with tremendous enthusiasm to produce an issue that is a fantastic read and that I’m quite proud of.

Having now read the issue, I can’t disagree with Carter about any of this. I interviewed Apatow after he edited a book for McSweeney’s, and I was struck by how invested in the work he was. I don’t doubt that he put a lot of work into his issue of Vanity Fair, too. And it shows. You should read it.

David Haglund is a senior editor at Slate. He runs Brow Beat, Slate's culture blog.



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.


Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 16 2014 11:46 PM The Scariest Campfire Story More horrifying than bears, snakes, or hook-handed killers.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.