The Past Is Not Dead. In Fact, It’s Suing.

Slate's Culture Blog
Oct. 26 2012 4:17 PM

The Past Is Not Dead. In Fact, It’s Suing.

midnight in paris
Owen Wilson and Rachel McAdams in Midnight in Paris

Sony Pictures Classics.

The estate of William Faulkner has filed a lawsuit against Sony Pictures over a line in Woody Allen’s film Midnight in Paris. The line in question belongs to Owen Wilson’s character, Gil, who says, “The past is not dead! Actually, it’s not even past.’ You know who said that? Faulkner. And he was right.” As the estate notes in its complaint, the correct phrasing of the famous comment, which appears in Faulkner’s Requiem for a Nun, is: “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.” The estate cites this inaccuracy in its suit, arguing that Gil’s remark is “likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, and/or to deceive” the people who see Midnight in Paris.

Is this lawsuit as crazy as it sounds?


Pretty much. Sony can easily argue that this is an example of “fair use,” copyright lawyer Lloyd Jassin told me today. Under fair use, artists, scholars, and others can “borrow or use small portions of in-copyright works for socially productive purposes without seeking permission.” The intent, Jassin says, is to prevent a restrictive creative environment and provide a balance between free speech and the rights of individual creators. The fact that the line is misquoted, which is not uncommon, is a moot point. In the U.S., unlike France, there are no moral rights statutes which would prevent the writers from “editing poorly.”

The studio can make a very convincing case that Allen is not simply “regurgitating” Faulkner, but using his words (or an approximation of them) to make a larger creative statement about Gil and the famous Southern writer. Gil’s character is a screenwriter struggling to write a novel—making him a mirror image of Faulkner himself, a successful novelist who later went to Hollywood, famously writing the screenplay for The Big Sleep, among many other films.

The quoting and attribution of Faulkner in Midnight in Paris is Allen’s way of bringing new meaning to a famous quote. “The motive for quoting Faulkner was to make a point,” says Jassin, “not steal bread from the mouths of Faulkner's orphan children.”

Aisha Harris is a Slate staff writer.



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

Yes, Black Families Tend to Spank More. That Doesn’t Mean It’s Good for Black Kids.

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge


The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 6:23 PM Bryan Cranston Reenacts Baseball’s Best Moments to Promote the Upcoming Postseason
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.