The Richest, Fudgiest Brownies It Is Possible to Make

Slate's Culture Blog
Feb. 8 2012 11:25 AM

You’re Doing It Wrong: Brownies

1328717679834
Photo by L. V. Anderson

Chocolate Chip Brownies.

Can a brownie be too rich? I suspect that many brownie-lovers would answer with an immediate—and perhaps slightly defensive—no.

L.V. Anderson L.V. Anderson

L.V. Anderson is a Slate assistant editor. She edits Slate's food and drink sections and writes Brow Beat's recipe column, You're Doing It Wrong. 

Historical chauvinists might disagree. The exact origin of the brownie is hazy, but the first published recipes, from 1906 and 1907, contained less chocolate and fewer eggs than most contemporary recipes. The result was probably what today are euphemistically called “cakelike brownies,” a term that covers all manner of dry, crumbly sins. Generally, as good chocolate and butter have become cheaper and more widely available, sensible home cooks have implicitly agreed that fudge-like brownies represent progress, not a perversion.

Advertisement

Let us then accept that the purpose of a brownie recipe is to maximize fudginess and minimize everything else. The chief impediment to this goal is flour. Brownies need flour, of course—without it, they’d be eggy chocolate soup—but too much flour makes them parched, stiff, and literally hard to swallow.

There are at least two ways to circumvent flour’s dehydrating properties. The first is to substitute ground nuts for some of the flour. Once pulverized in the food processor, almonds, hazelnuts, or walnuts mimic flour’s powdery texture, while bringing the added benefits of extra fat and a mild nutty flavor. And unlike the chopped or whole nuts people often add to brownies, the pulverized variety don’t distract from the chocolatiness of a truly great brownie.

Another way to heighten brownies’ fudginess is to stir extra chocolate into the batter right before baking. I like using milk chocolate chips, but semisweet and bittersweet chips also work well. The result is a slight but delightful variation in texture between the moist brownie crumb and the waxy chocolate chips.

These brownies are thicker and a little saltier than average. Like Kathleen Edwards’s new album, they’re plenty sweet, but not cloying. And while it may not be possible for brownies to be too rich, these ones push the fudginess envelope about as far as it can go.

Chocolate Chip Brownies
Yield: 12 to 16 servings
Time: About 1 hour, partially unattended

Oil or butter for greasing the pan
½ cup almonds, hazelnuts, or walnuts
¾ cup flour
½ teaspoon salt
12 tablespoons (1½ sticks) unsalted butter, cut into ½-inch slices
6 ounces unsweetened chocolate, roughly chopped
1¾ cups sugar
3 large eggs
2 teaspoons vanilla extract
1 cup milk chocolate chips

1. Heat the oven to 350°F. Line the bottom and sides of an 8- or 9-inch square or round pan with foil or parchment paper and grease the lining. Put the nuts in a food processor and process until finely ground. Add the flour and salt, and pulse a few times to combine.

2. Put the butter and chocolate in a large saucepan over low heat. Cook, stirring constantly, until they melt and the mixture is smooth. (Or combine the butter and chocolate in a microwave-safe bowl and microwave in 30-second intervals, stirring after each interval, until they melt.) Remove from the heat and stir in the sugar. Beat together the eggs and vanilla in a small bowl, then add the egg mixture to the saucepan and stir to combine. Stir in first the flour mixture, then the chocolate chips, and transfer the batter to the greased pan.

3. Bake until the brownies begin to pull away from the sides of the pan, about 30 minutes. Cool thoroughly before removing from the pan and serving. (The brownies will keep for a few days wrapped in foil or parchment paper at room temperature.)

Previously in You’re Doing It Wrong:
Chili
Granola
Pizza
Cabbage Salad
Black-Eyed Peas

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

The Extraordinary Amicus Brief That Attempts to Explain the Wu-Tang Clan to the Supreme Court Justices

Amazon Is Officially a Gadget Company. Here Are Its Six New Devices.

The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Altered State

The Plight of the Pre-Legalization Marijuana Offender

What should happen to weed users and dealers busted before the stuff was legal?

Surprise! The Women Hired to Fix the NFL Think the NFL Is Just Great.

You Shouldn’t Spank Anyone but Your Consensual Sex Partner

Moneybox
Sept. 17 2014 5:10 PM The Most Awkward Scenario in Which a Man Can Hold a Door for a Woman
  News & Politics
Altered State
Sept. 17 2014 11:51 PM The Plight of the Pre-Legalization Marijuana Offender What should happen to weed users and dealers busted before the stuff was legal?
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
  Life
Outward
Sept. 17 2014 6:53 PM LGBTQ Luminaries Honored With MacArthur “Genius” Fellowships
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 6:14 PM Today in Gender Gaps: Biking
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 8:25 PM A New Song and Music Video From Angel Olsen, Indie’s Next Big Thing
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 9:00 PM Amazon Is Now a Gadget Company
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 17 2014 11:48 PM Spanking Is Great for Sex Which is why it’s grotesque for parenting.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 17 2014 3:51 PM NFL Jerk Watch: Roger Goodell How much should you loathe the pro football commissioner?