Why is Google+ Built to Hold More Users than There Are People on the Planet?

Slate's Culture Blog
July 28 2011 2:08 PM

Why is Google+ Built to Hold More Users than There Are People on the Planet?

Photo by KEXINO via Flickr.

Since Google+ launched on June 28, several Slate staffers have jumped on the bandwagon and signed up for accounts.  Each account, we noticed, comes with a 21-digit user ID. That means that Google+ could conceivably accommodate a sextillion users—or more than a billion times as many people as there are on the planet. Why are those ID numbers so long?

According to a Google+ spokeswoman, user ID numbers are randomly selected for each account and are in no way related to the actual number of Google+ users. (So if your user ID is 123456789012345678901, that doesn’t mean that you’re the 123,456,789,012,345,678,901th person to have signed up for the service.) The spokeswoman wouldn’t comment any further on the topic.


A lengthy string of arbitrary digits would help protect users’ privacy—and Google’s business interests. The social network business model relies on monopolizing user information, so the company would want to make it as hard as possible to guess existing Google+ IDs. The various guessing techniques available, such as so-called binary search algorithms, become virtually unsolvable when there are a few trillion or so empty slots for each assigned number.

According to Micah Sherr, a Georgetown professor of computer science (who did not work on the project), Google is probably using a hash function to create its lengthy identifiers. In a hash function, some input—say, a username and some additional bits of secret information, such as the name of the user’s childhood pet—is inserted into a formula that converts that data first into binary code and then into a numerical user ID. (So while that ID can appear to be randomly chosen from a very large set, it’s actually being calculated in a specific way.) The user ID is thus seeded with information about the user, though it's practically impossible to extract that information.* A hash function would also guarantee that all user IDs remained unique.

If Google isn’t interested in embedding IDs with information, UCLA computer science professor Peter Reiher speculates, it could simply be using a random number generator, inserting a code to make each number in the set appear only once.

These ID-generating techniques aren’t unique to Google+: At least part of your credit card number is created by hash functions or random number generators. After all, if the number on your Visa corresponded directly to the number of bank customers, it would be easy to guess (and steal) other, existing credit card numbers—all you’d have to do is add or subtract one digit to or from your own. Considering how strongly we guard our credit card information, it should be reassuring that Google+ uses 21 digits—five more than credit card companies do.

* Correction, July 29: This post originally suggested that the user information used to seed ID numbers created with a hash function could be extracted; actually, hash functions are practically irreversible.



The World’s Politest Protesters

The Occupy Central demonstrators are courteous. That’s actually what makes them so dangerous.

The Religious Right Is Not Happy With Republicans  

The XX Factor
Oct. 1 2014 4:58 PM The Religious Right Is Not Happy With Republicans  

The Feds Have Declared War on Encryption—and the New Privacy Measures From Apple and Google

The One Fact About Ebola That Should Calm You

It spreads slowly.

These “Dark” Lego Masterpieces Are Delightful and Evocative


Operation Backbone

How White Boy Rick, a legendary Detroit cocaine dealer, helped the FBI uncover brazen police corruption.


Talking White

Black people’s disdain for “proper English” and academic achievement is a myth.

Activists Are Trying to Save an Iranian Woman Sentenced to Death for Killing Her Alleged Rapist

Piper Kerman on Why She Dressed Like a Hitchcock Heroine for Her Prison Sentencing

  News & Politics
Oct. 1 2014 7:26 PM Talking White Black people’s disdain for “proper English” and academic achievement is a myth.
Oct. 1 2014 2:16 PM Wall Street Tackles Chat Services, Shies Away From Diversity Issues 
Oct. 1 2014 6:02 PM Facebook Relaxes Its “Real Name” Policy; Drag Queens Celebrate
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 1 2014 5:11 PM Celebrity Feminist Identification Has Reached Peak Meaninglessness
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Oct. 1 2014 3:24 PM Revelry (and Business) at Mohonk Photos and highlights from Slate’s annual retreat.
Brow Beat
Oct. 1 2014 9:39 PM Tom Cruise Dies Over and Over Again in This Edge of Tomorrow Supercut
Future Tense
Oct. 1 2014 6:59 PM EU’s Next Digital Commissioner Thinks Keeping Nude Celeb Photos in the Cloud Is “Stupid”
  Health & Science
Oct. 1 2014 4:03 PM Does the Earth Really Have a “Hum”? Yes, but probably not the one you’re thinking.
Sports Nut
Oct. 1 2014 5:19 PM Bunt-a-Palooza! How bad was the Kansas City Royals’ bunt-all-the-time strategy in the American League wild-card game?