News Corp has found yet another way to annoy investors. The seemingly tardy discovery by Rupert Murdoch’s family empire that non-U.S. holders control 36 percent of its voting stock - breaching the 25 percent limit for owners of American television broadcasters - has led it to suspend half the voting rights of overseas owners. Even shareholders resigned to disenfranchisement have cause to worry.
They’ll be used to the control exerted by Murdoch. Owners of the company’s more numerous A shares don’t get a vote at all on most things. And voting B share investors are up against the family’s nearly 40 percent stake. In a tacit admission the conglomerate cocked up the monitoring of its shareholder register, the Murdochs agreed not to go beyond that percentage in any vote, even though foreign investors will now only have half the votes they had before.
All the same, the suspension may needle affected shareholders, including the retail and institutional bases in Murdoch’s native Australia. But what’s really galling is the bungle itself. The Fox TV franchise and other channels in the United States are critical to News Corp’s business, and they depend on licenses from the Federal Communications Commission.
Those licenses in turn rely on the company staying within shareholding and voting rules. While it seems to have done so with ownership of A and B shares combined, it looks as if the voting aspect escaped the company’s investor relations and legal teams - until now, when license renewals are looming.
The UK phone-hacking scandal and all that it wrought, including the departure of News Corp’s general counsel last summer, may have been a distraction. And all that followed a series of other missteps, like overpaying for Dow Jones and MySpace. But Murdoch should be acutely aware of the FCC’s U.S. ownership requirements. News Corp’s antipodean origins created headaches in the mid-1990s over the original acquisition of U.S. stations, with a waiver eventually being granted.
Any such accommodation looks improbable now. All News Corp shareholders would be harmed if the company lost its licenses because of the oversight. Yet it is characteristic Murdoch justice that those least responsible for the error have to suffer to stop that from happening.
Read more at Reuters Breakingviews.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Democrats’ War at Home
How can the president’s party defend itself from the president’s foreign policy blunders?
Congress’ Public Shaming of the Secret Service Was Political Grandstanding at Its Best
Michigan’s Tradition of Football “Toughness” Needs to Go—Starting With Coach Hoke
A Plentiful, Renewable Resource That America Keeps Overlooking
Windows 8 Was So Bad That Microsoft Will Skip Straight to Windows 10
Cringing. Ducking. Mumbling.
How GOP candidates react whenever someone brings up reproductive rights or gay marriage.
You Deserve a Pre-cation
The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.