<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : sex difference</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+difference/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: sex difference</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Chimps, Toys, and Sex?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/28/chimps-toys-and-sex.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4457</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4457.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4457</wfw:commentRss><description>OK, Will , I am fuzzing up your thesis about sex difference because I wonder about how grounded parts of it are, and like I said, I find exaggerations of sex difference slightly maddening. So a few thoughts in response to yours (and from here on out I...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/28/chimps-toys-and-sex.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4457" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+difference/default.aspx">sex difference</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Female+sexuality/default.aspx">Female sexuality</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Dan+Bergner/default.aspx">Dan Bergner</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/aggression/default.aspx">aggression</category></item><item><title>What Do We Want To Know About What We Want?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/26/what-do-we-want-to-know-about-what-we-want.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4423</guid><dc:creator>Ann Hulbert</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4423.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4423</wfw:commentRss><description>Meghan , not to evade your questions, but I found myself focusing on the subtexts of Daniel Bergner's article : He is particularly fascinated by the difficulty of doing scientific research on female sexuality and by the jarring multiplicity of theories...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/26/what-do-we-want-to-know-about-what-we-want.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4423" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex/default.aspx">sex</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+difference/default.aspx">sex difference</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/New+York+Times+Magazine/default.aspx">New York Times Magazine</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Female+sexuality/default.aspx">Female sexuality</category></item><item><title>Mars and Venus Walk Among Us</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/07/01/mars-and-venus-walk-among-us.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:3253</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/3253.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3253</wfw:commentRss><description>Yes, I think it's safe to say that Clark Hoyt doesn't get Maureen Dowd, despite her efforts to explain herself to him (what a fun interview that must have been). Dowd said that she's playing with sexist gender constructs, not aping them. She also defended...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/07/01/mars-and-venus-walk-among-us.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3253" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/maureen+dowd/default.aspx">maureen dowd</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/louann+brizendine/default.aspx">louann brizendine</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/susan+pinker/default.aspx">susan pinker</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+difference/default.aspx">sex difference</category></item></channel></rss>