<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : polls</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/polls/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: polls</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Becoming Pro-Life</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/22/becoming-pro-life.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5651</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5651.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5651</wfw:commentRss><description>I’ve been mulling the responses I got, via email and comments , to my question about why a recent Gallup poll might show a seven point jump in the percentage of people who define themselves as prolife (from 44 percent last year to 51 percent this year)....(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/05/22/becoming-pro-life.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5651" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/abortion/default.aspx">abortion</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/polls/default.aspx">polls</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/pro-life/default.aspx">pro-life</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/pro-choice/default.aspx">pro-choice</category></item><item><title>More in the Annals of Joe Biden Statements</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/10/20/more-in-the-annals-of-joe-biden-statements.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:3881</guid><dc:creator>Meghan O'Rourke</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/3881.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3881</wfw:commentRss><description>So, news outlets reported that yesterday Joe Biden told fundraisers in Seattle that in the next six months an international crisis would "test" Barack Obama just as one had tested Kennedy. According to reports, Biden told supporters: "The world is looking....(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/10/20/more-in-the-annals-of-joe-biden-statements.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3881" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Barack+Obama/default.aspx">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/John+McCain/default.aspx">John McCain</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Joe+Biden/default.aspx">Joe Biden</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/polls/default.aspx">polls</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/election+_2700_08/default.aspx">election '08</category></item><item><title>More on the Conservative Shake-Up</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/10/15/more-on-the-conservative-shake-up.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:3844</guid><dc:creator>Juliet Lapidos</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/3844.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3844</wfw:commentRss><description>I'm not at all convinced that Obama's lead is safe, and I think that the positive poll numbers of late could result in liberal complacency on Election Day. But what's indisputable is that Obama's apparent advantage, and the Palin pick, are creating fissures...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/10/15/more-on-the-conservative-shake-up.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3844" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/polls/default.aspx">polls</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/vice-presidential+choice/default.aspx">vice-presidential choice</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Christopher+Buckley+endorses+Obama/default.aspx">Christopher Buckley endorses Obama</category></item><item><title>Polls and Palin</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/09/03/polls-and-palin.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:3561</guid><dc:creator>Dahlia Lithwick</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/3561.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3561</wfw:commentRss><description>A guest post from Slate 's and The Big Money 's Jim Ledbetter: The Sarah Palin narrative is incomplete and will likely remain so even after her speech tonight. Nonetheless, I perceive a nagging gap between the way the media is so far discussing her candidacy...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/09/03/polls-and-palin.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3561" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/women/default.aspx">women</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/polls/default.aspx">polls</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Sarah+Palin/default.aspx">Sarah Palin</category></item><item><title>Send Them to Irkutsk </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/04/02/send-them-to-irkutsk.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:2363</guid><dc:creator>Anne Applebaum</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/2363.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2363</wfw:commentRss><description>No, not the politicians' spouses who can't keep away from prostitutes .... Before it gets forgotten in a flood of Big Beaver jokes, I wanted to pick up on what Juliet wrote: I saw that BBC poll about world-perceptions-of-America too, and reckoned it was...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/04/02/send-them-to-irkutsk.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2363" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/polls/default.aspx">polls</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/reputation+abroad/default.aspx">reputation abroad</category></item><item><title>The World Hates America a Little Less</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/04/02/good-news-sort-of.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:2355</guid><dc:creator>Juliet Lapidos</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/2355.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2355</wfw:commentRss><description>When I saw the headline " America's Global Image Stops Sinking in a Poll " on the New York Times Lede blog, I clicked on it eagerly, expecting (because I'm gullible) some moderate to good news. Sadly, the poll—a worldwide survey conducted by the BBC and...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/04/02/good-news-sort-of.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2355" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/polls/default.aspx">polls</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/reputation+abroad/default.aspx">reputation abroad</category></item><item><title>Change Is Good. Polls Are Caca.</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/02/06/change-is-good-polls-are-caca.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:1378</guid><dc:creator>Melinda Henneberger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/1378.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1378</wfw:commentRss><description>Every year for Lent, I give up speaking ill of anyone. It is a long 40 days, and it begins today. (I mention this so that if it seems like I've had my brain removed, no, I haven't, and I will be back to my old critical self before you can say mortification...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/02/06/change-is-good-polls-are-caca.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1378" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Barack+Obama/default.aspx">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/John+McCain/default.aspx">John McCain</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Mitt+Romney/default.aspx">Mitt Romney</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Democrats/default.aspx">Democrats</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Republicans/default.aspx">Republicans</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/_2700_08+election/default.aspx">'08 election</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Evangelicals/default.aspx">Evangelicals</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Christians/default.aspx">Christians</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/polls/default.aspx">polls</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Super+Tuesday/default.aspx">Super Tuesday</category></item><item><title>The More Electable Candidate</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/02/01/who-s-more-electable.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:1272</guid><dc:creator>Juliet Lapidos</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/1272.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1272</wfw:commentRss><description>It's become a commonplace assumption that Barack Obama would fare better than Hillary Clinton in a general election—that he's the more "electable" candidate. But a new poll shows no discernible difference between the two. Either candidate would trounce...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/02/01/who-s-more-electable.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1272" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Barack+Obama/default.aspx">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Hillary+Clinton/default.aspx">Hillary Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/_2700_08+election/default.aspx">'08 election</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/polls/default.aspx">polls</category></item><item><title>Overselling Reason</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/01/03/overselling-reason.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:600</guid><dc:creator>Juliet Lapidos</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/600.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=600</wfw:commentRss><description>With all this confusing chatter about Iowa polling numbers (seems like every poll says something different, except when you account for the margin of error, in which case they all say the same thing: "Who knows!"), I think it's worth pointing out that...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/01/03/overselling-reason.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=600" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Iowa+caucus/default.aspx">Iowa caucus</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/polls/default.aspx">polls</category></item></channel></rss>