<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : monogamy</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/monogamy/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: monogamy</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>"Couples Retreat" Peddles a Strange Vision of Fear-Induced Monogamy</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/10/12/couples-retreat-peddles-a-strange-vision-of-fear-induced-monogamy.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:6700</guid><dc:creator>Jessica Grose</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/6700.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6700</wfw:commentRss><description>A post from DoubleX blogger Lauren Bans: I disregarded the bad reviews and saw Couples Retreat this weekend, mostly because I have a sort of inexplicable faith in the comedy prowess of Vince Vaughn. As expected, it didn’t offer much beyond the Hollywood-happy...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/10/12/couples-retreat-peddles-a-strange-vision-of-fear-induced-monogamy.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6700" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/monogamy/default.aspx">monogamy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Jon+Favreau/default.aspx">Jon Favreau</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Couples+Retreat/default.aspx">Couples Retreat</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Kristin+Davis/default.aspx">Kristin Davis</category></item><item><title>Edwards Confesses!</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/08/08/edwards-confesses.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:3431</guid><dc:creator>Rachael Larimore</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/3431.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3431</wfw:commentRss><description>OK, so John Edwards cops to the affair but says he's not the baby daddy to Rielle Hunter's infant. A few problems with all of this. First, is he trying to help himself by saying "he did not love her"? Is that supposed to make Elizabeth feel better, that...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/08/08/edwards-confesses.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3431" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/John+Edwards/default.aspx">John Edwards</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/monogamy/default.aspx">monogamy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Rielle+Hunter/default.aspx">Rielle Hunter</category></item><item><title>Gettin' Some Strange</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/05/20/gettin-some-strange.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 21:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:2917</guid><dc:creator>Dana Stevens</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/2917.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2917</wfw:commentRss><description>That's funny, Meghan — when you just posted asking if any of us had seen Philip Weiss' cover piece for this week's New York , I was debating whether it was worth gathering my own thoughts about it. Poor Weiss is already being eaten alive, entertainingly,...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/05/20/gettin-some-strange.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2917" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/marriage/default.aspx">marriage</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Eliot+Spitzer/default.aspx">Eliot Spitzer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Vito+Fossella/default.aspx">Vito Fossella</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/monogamy/default.aspx">monogamy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Philip+Weiss/default.aspx">Philip Weiss</category></item></channel></rss>