<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : family planning</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/family+planning/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: family planning</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Quiverfull Feminism </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/04/08/quiverfull-feminism.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5230</guid><dc:creator>Kerry Howley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5230.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5230</wfw:commentRss><description>"The threat of population decline," writes Michelle Goldberg at the American Prospect, "is one of the best arguments yet for socialized day care, family leave, and other dreamy Scandinavian-style policies.... I get why liberals have shied away from this...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/04/08/quiverfull-feminism.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5230" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/feminism/default.aspx">feminism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/domestic+policy/default.aspx">domestic policy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/birth+control/default.aspx">birth control</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/fertility/default.aspx">fertility</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/quiverfull/default.aspx">quiverfull</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/family+planning/default.aspx">family planning</category></item><item><title>Maybe the Duggars Are The World's Largest Rorschach Blob</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/30/maybe-the-duggars-are-the-world-s-largest-rorschach-blob.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4485</guid><dc:creator>Noreen Malone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4485.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4485</wfw:commentRss><description>Jessica , I think you're right that the fascination with the Duggars and their cohort is more than simple freak show, can't-look-away compulsion. People are always oddly obsessed with/judgmental of big families, even if they're not extreme cases. I'm...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/30/maybe-the-duggars-are-the-world-s-largest-rorschach-blob.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4485" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/family/default.aspx">family</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/motherhood/default.aspx">motherhood</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/family+planning/default.aspx">family planning</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Octuplets/default.aspx">Octuplets</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/duggars/default.aspx">duggars</category></item><item><title>For Women, Good Jobs Depend on Good Contraception ... and Yet ... </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/29/for-women-good-jobs-depend-on-good-contraception-and-yet.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4473</guid><dc:creator>E.J. Graff</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4473.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4473</wfw:commentRss><description>Dayo , I agree with you on a number of things about contraception and economic prosperity for the country and for women—and disagree with Rachael 's contention that contraception isn't related to jobs. Let's be real: Most women (with the exception of...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/29/for-women-good-jobs-depend-on-good-contraception-and-yet.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4473" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/birth+control/default.aspx">birth control</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/contraception/default.aspx">contraception</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/stimulus+package/default.aspx">stimulus package</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/family+planning/default.aspx">family planning</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/don_2700_t+ask+don_2700_t+tel/default.aspx">don't ask don't tel</category></item><item><title>More Stimulation</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/27/more-stimulation.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4453</guid><dc:creator>E.J. Graff</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4453.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4453</wfw:commentRss><description>Rachael , it's lovely to agree with you ... at least partly. I too am vastly in favor of contraception being available to all, and yet agree that it shouldn't be in the stimulus package. I've long found it amusing that Viagra, but not contraception, is...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/27/more-stimulation.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4453" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Barack+Obama/default.aspx">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/birth+control/default.aspx">birth control</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/contraception/default.aspx">contraception</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/stimulus+package/default.aspx">stimulus package</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/family+planning/default.aspx">family planning</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gag+rule/default.aspx">gag rule</category></item><item><title>Is Birth Control, Um, Stimulating?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/27/is-birth-control-um-stimulating.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4451</guid><dc:creator>Rachael Larimore</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4451.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4451</wfw:commentRss><description>When I read this morning that President Obama was going to ask House Democrats to pull family-planning funds from the stimulus package, I breathed a sigh of relief. Not because I'm opposed to birth control (quite the contrary, actually), but because I...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/27/is-birth-control-um-stimulating.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4451" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Barack+Obama/default.aspx">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/birth+control/default.aspx">birth control</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/stimulus+package/default.aspx">stimulus package</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Nancy+Pelosi/default.aspx">Nancy Pelosi</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/family+planning/default.aspx">family planning</category></item></channel></rss>