<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : domestic policy</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/domestic+policy/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: domestic policy</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Quiverfull Feminism </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/04/08/quiverfull-feminism.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5230</guid><dc:creator>Kerry Howley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5230.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5230</wfw:commentRss><description>"The threat of population decline," writes Michelle Goldberg at the American Prospect, "is one of the best arguments yet for socialized day care, family leave, and other dreamy Scandinavian-style policies.... I get why liberals have shied away from this...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/04/08/quiverfull-feminism.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5230" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/feminism/default.aspx">feminism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/domestic+policy/default.aspx">domestic policy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/birth+control/default.aspx">birth control</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/fertility/default.aspx">fertility</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/quiverfull/default.aspx">quiverfull</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/family+planning/default.aspx">family planning</category></item><item><title>They Don't Call it a Majority for Nothin'</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/29/they-don-t-call-it-a-majority-for-nothin.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4468</guid><dc:creator>Dayo Olopade</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4468.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4468</wfw:commentRss><description>OK, OK. Eve, you’re right . The bailout (whoops, stimulus—whoops, recovery) bill passed the House , without the family planning funds, and without any Republican support. So the big bad Democratic majority didn’t need to kowtow to Republicans after all—which...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/29/they-don-t-call-it-a-majority-for-nothin.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4468" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/domestic+policy/default.aspx">domestic policy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/birth+control/default.aspx">birth control</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/teenage+pregnancy/default.aspx">teenage pregnancy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/economic+crisis/default.aspx">economic crisis</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/blue+dog+democrats/default.aspx">blue dog democrats</category></item><item><title>“Rule by Republican Hissy Fit”?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/28/rule-by-republican-hissy-fit.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4461</guid><dc:creator>Dayo Olopade</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4461.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4461</wfw:commentRss><description>I’m a bit disappointed by President Obama’s rude expurgation of contraceptive planning from the “economic recovery package”—as we’re being asked to call the stimulus bill that’s working its way through Congress. Perhaps I’m just not down with all the...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/01/28/rule-by-republican-hissy-fit.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4461" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/pregnancy/default.aspx">pregnancy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/health+care/default.aspx">health care</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/domestic+policy/default.aspx">domestic policy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/birth+control/default.aspx">birth control</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/women_2700_s+health/default.aspx">women's health</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/economics/default.aspx">economics</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Female+sexuality/default.aspx">Female sexuality</category></item><item><title>Keeping Track of Our Time</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/03/04/keeping-track-of-our-time.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:1723</guid><dc:creator>Ann Hulbert</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/1723.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1723</wfw:commentRss><description>Quick, before we're all caught up in the reading of campaign entrails, I'd like to mention an item on the agenda of the Department of Labor's first budget hearing later this week: the American Time Use Survey, which will be eliminated if the Bush administration...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/03/04/keeping-track-of-our-time.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1723" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/domestic+policy/default.aspx">domestic policy</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/family/default.aspx">family</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/social+statistics/default.aspx">social statistics</category></item></channel></rss>