<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : chastity</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/chastity/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: chastity</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Virgins: Not as Dumb as You Think (Or Are They?)</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/03/31/virgins-not-as-dumb-as-you-think-or-are-they.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:2306</guid><dc:creator>Melinda Henneberger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/2306.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2306</wfw:commentRss><description>Anybody else read the NYT Magazine piece on Harvard's intentional virgins? It was in many ways right off-the-rack: Not all young people who are virgins on purpose are dum-dum religious nuts. Some of them—brace yourselves—have even infiltrated Harvard....(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/03/31/virgins-not-as-dumb-as-you-think-or-are-they.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2306" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/feminism/default.aspx">feminism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+stereotype/default.aspx">gender stereotype</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sexuality/default.aspx">sexuality</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/media+coverage/default.aspx">media coverage</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/chastity/default.aspx">chastity</category></item><item><title>Rape-Proof Pants?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/03/10/rape-proof-pants.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:1831</guid><dc:creator>Ellen Tarlin</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/1831.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1831</wfw:commentRss><description>BBC News reports that a court in Rome ruled that “ Women in jeans 'cannot be raped.' “ What a wonderful coup this information will be for parents of girls. Just imagine, you no longer have to worry about preserving your daughter’s virtue—just buy her...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/03/10/rape-proof-pants.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1831" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/courts/default.aspx">courts</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/chastity/default.aspx">chastity</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/jeans/default.aspx">jeans</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Italy/default.aspx">Italy</category></item></channel></rss>