<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : california</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/california/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: california</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Same-Sex Marriage in Vermont?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/04/01/same-sex-marriage-in-vermont.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5150</guid><dc:creator>E.J. Graff</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5150.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5150</wfw:commentRss><description>Speaking of another kind of freedom, last week, the Vermont Senate has passed a bill that would enable same-sex couples to marry, and not just get civilly unionized (civilly united? civilized?).The Vermont House is expected to pass the bill this week....(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/04/01/same-sex-marriage-in-vermont.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5150" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/LGBT+rights/default.aspx">LGBT rights</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/same-sex+marriage/default.aspx">same-sex marriage</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/california/default.aspx">california</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/civil+unions/default.aspx">civil unions</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/history+of+marriage/default.aspx">history of marriage</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Vermont/default.aspx">Vermont</category></item><item><title>How Not To Fix Prop 8</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/11/21/how-not-to-fix-prop-8.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:4077</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/4077.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4077</wfw:commentRss><description>I hate to say this, but I'm not a fan of a key piece of the challenge to Proposition 8 that same-sex marriage advocates are bringing in the California Supreme Court. By all means, ask the court to recognize the 18,000 same-sex marriages performed since...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/11/21/how-not-to-fix-prop-8.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4077" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/_2700_08+election/default.aspx">'08 election</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/same-sex+marriage/default.aspx">same-sex marriage</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/california/default.aspx">california</category></item><item><title>Marriage, Interrupted</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/10/27/marriage-interrupted.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:3935</guid><dc:creator>Sarah Wildman</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/3935.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3935</wfw:commentRss><description>I admit that lately I've been thinking more about clothes (and their symbolism) than issues, but in today's New York Times longtime religion reporter Laurie Goodstein writes about the various religious leaders descending on California in support of Proposition...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/10/27/marriage-interrupted.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3935" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gay+marriage/default.aspx">gay marriage</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sarah+Palin+clothes/default.aspx">sarah Palin clothes</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/swift+boat/default.aspx">swift boat</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/california/default.aspx">california</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/proposition+8/default.aspx">proposition 8</category></item></channel></rss>