<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : breast cancer</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: breast cancer</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>Mammogram Panic</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/25/mammogram-panic.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:6973</guid><dc:creator>Emily Yoffe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/6973.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6973</wfw:commentRss><description>Emily B. maybe the government task force on mammography was actually a plot by radiologists to get more American women to insist on mammograms. This whole mess is partly the fault of the cancer establishment. Think how many times you've heard "one in...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/25/mammogram-panic.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6973" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/mammograms/default.aspx">mammograms</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/u.s.+preventive+services+task+force/default.aspx">u.s. preventive services task force</category></item><item><title>Forget the Cost, Give Us Our Mammograms</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/24/forget-the-cost-give-us-our-mammograms.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:6966</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/6966.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6966</wfw:commentRss><description>Depressing poll numbers from Gallup and USA Today ( via Instapundit ): Seventy-six percent of women say they disagree or strongly disagree with the recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to delay mammograms to age 50. And 84 percent...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/24/forget-the-cost-give-us-our-mammograms.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6966" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/mammograms/default.aspx">mammograms</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/u.s.+preventive+services+task+force/default.aspx">u.s. preventive services task force</category></item><item><title>Stefanie Spielman, RIP</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/23/stefanie-spielman-rip.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:6958</guid><dc:creator>Rachael Larimore</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/6958.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6958</wfw:commentRss><description>Sad news out of Ohio: Funeral services will be held tomorrow for Stefanie Spielman, who died late last week at age 42 after a very long—and very public—struggle with breast cancer. Spielman might have been among the millions of women who face breast cancer...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/23/stefanie-spielman-rip.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6958" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Stefanie+Spielman/default.aspx">Stefanie Spielman</category></item><item><title>Know More, Screen Less</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/20/know-more-screen-less.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:6954</guid><dc:creator>Emily Yoffe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/6954.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6954</wfw:commentRss><description>Emily B , I agree with you that it’s really unfortunate that the conclusion that we don’t need to routinely do mammograms until 50, instead of aparking a national, rational discussion about the advisability of “screening and prevention,” has become the...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/20/know-more-screen-less.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6954" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/mammograms/default.aspx">mammograms</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/health+care+reform/default.aspx">health care reform</category></item><item><title>The Mammogram Mania</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/20/the-mammogram-mania.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:6953</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/6953.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6953</wfw:commentRss><description>I've been trying to understand the flap this week over the recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Task Force— a group ill-prepared to handle the controversy —to delay routine mammograms to age 50 for most women. And now, in a truly terrible coincidence...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/20/the-mammogram-mania.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6953" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/cervical+cancer/default.aspx">cervical cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/pap+smear/default.aspx">pap smear</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/mammogram/default.aspx">mammogram</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/us.+preventive+task+force/default.aspx">us. preventive task force</category></item><item><title>Women Need a Pap Smear for Breast Cancer</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/17/women-need-a-pap-smear-for-breast-cancer.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:6934</guid><dc:creator>Samantha Henig</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/6934.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6934</wfw:commentRss><description>A guest post from Cindy Pearson, the executive director of the National Women's Health Network: Mammography screening just doesn’t work very well in women before menopause, as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has now recognized . Everyone hoped...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/17/women-need-a-pap-smear-for-breast-cancer.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6934" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/mammograms/default.aspx">mammograms</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/mammography/default.aspx">mammography</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/u.s.+preventive/default.aspx">u.s. preventive</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/national+women_2700_s+health+network/default.aspx">national women's health network</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/pap+smear/default.aspx">pap smear</category></item><item><title>The New Mammogram Guidelines Smell Like Rationing</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/17/the-new-mammogram-guidelines-smell-like-rationing.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:6933</guid><dc:creator>Rachael Larimore</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/6933.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6933</wfw:commentRss><description>We keep hearing from proponents of health care reform that government rationing of health care is a “ canard .” We don’t have health care reform yet, but with the new recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that women shouldn’t get...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/17/the-new-mammogram-guidelines-smell-like-rationing.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6933" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/mammograms/default.aspx">mammograms</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/health+care+reform/default.aspx">health care reform</category></item><item><title>Would You Take a Pill That Prevents Cancer? Unlikely.</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/13/would-you-take-a-pill-that-prevents-cancer-unlikely.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:6916</guid><dc:creator>Kerry Howley</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/6916.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=6916</wfw:commentRss><description>Gina Kolata points out , once again, that diet and exercise have not been shown to affect breast cancer rates. Massive, well-run observational studies and randomized controlled trials turn up nothing. This finding appears to be unacceptable; popular culture...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/11/13/would-you-take-a-pill-that-prevents-cancer-unlikely.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6916" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Gina+Kolata/default.aspx">Gina Kolata</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/cancer+drugs/default.aspx">cancer drugs</category></item><item><title>Just Say No to Mammograms?</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/31/just-say-no-to-mammograms.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:5141</guid><dc:creator>Emily Yoffe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/5141.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5141</wfw:commentRss><description>Hanna, the counterpart to your post about the dangers of prostate screening appeared in today's New York Times —a story about whether annual mammograms may be doing more harm than good. This isn't the first piece I've read that questions the mammogram...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2009/03/31/just-say-no-to-mammograms.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5141" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/mammograms/default.aspx">mammograms</category></item><item><title>John Edwards' Third Act </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/07/24/john-edwards-third-act.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:3368</guid><dc:creator>Bonnie Goldstein</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/3368.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3368</wfw:commentRss><description>Melinda , I don't mean to sound calloused and insensitive on top of my stated willingness to invade personal privacy, but, notwithstanding how plucky and determined she is, Elizabeth Edwards has inoperable metastasized cancer. Cancer grows, that's its...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/07/24/john-edwards-third-act.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3368" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/adultery/default.aspx">adultery</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/affair/default.aspx">affair</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Edwards+love+child/default.aspx">Edwards love child</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/elizabeth+edwards/default.aspx">elizabeth edwards</category></item><item><title>Adventures in Plastic Surgery</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/04/09/adventures-in-plastic-surgery.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:2450</guid><dc:creator>Melinda Henneberger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/2450.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2450</wfw:commentRss><description>Will's excellent tale of nip and tuck —about those poor plastic surgeons whose business in butt-lifts was not quite as recession-proof as they thought—has made my day, mean thing that I am. And if these lean times force a few more of these specialists...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/04/09/adventures-in-plastic-surgery.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2450" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/plastic+surgery/default.aspx">plastic surgery</category></item><item><title>Titties, Beer, and Breast Cancer</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/31/titties-beer-and-breast-cancer.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 19:03:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:128</guid><dc:creator>Meghan O'Rourke</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/128.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=128</wfw:commentRss><description>Today's the last day of Breast Cancer Awareness Month and some bloggers are arguing that the ubiquitous " pink-ribbon " approach has gone too far . (See the second panel.) Over at The Assertive Cancer Patient you can find a critique of the relentless...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/31/titties-beer-and-breast-cancer.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=128" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/sex+discrimination/default.aspx">sex discrimination</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/breast+cancer/default.aspx">breast cancer</category></item></channel></rss>