<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The XX Factor : academics</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/academics/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: academics</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.2)</generator><item><title>As Proust (and France Gall) Would Say: Ne Soyons Pas Si Bêtes</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/10/14/as-proust-and-france-gall-would-say-ne-soyons-pas-si-bete.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:3834</guid><dc:creator>Melinda Henneberger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/3834.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3834</wfw:commentRss><description>Rachael , I don't guess I know that many people who think of themselves as intellectuals—or would say so out loud, at any rate, no matter how much they love kicking around ideas. (My mom described me that way once, in anger, and it was soooo not a compliment....(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/10/14/as-proust-and-france-gall-would-say-ne-soyons-pas-si-bete.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3834" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Barack+Obama/default.aspx">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/academics/default.aspx">academics</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Bill+Clinton/default.aspx">Bill Clinton</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Al+Gore/default.aspx">Al Gore</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/anti-intellectualism/default.aspx">anti-intellectualism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/intellectualism/default.aspx">intellectualism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Pat+Moynihan/default.aspx">Pat Moynihan</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Bill+Bradley/default.aspx">Bill Bradley</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/Lionel+Trilling/default.aspx">Lionel Trilling</category></item><item><title>More on the Terrible Horrible No Good Billable Hour</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/04/01/more-on-the-terrible-horrible-no-good-billable-hour.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:2334</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/2334.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2334</wfw:commentRss><description>Judith , you nailed the efficiency vs. availability conundrum. I'm sure there is room for law firms to dethrone The Hour—and here's a good recent Slate piece by Lisa Lerer explaining why the push for them to do so is coming from their clients. Perhaps...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2008/04/01/more-on-the-terrible-horrible-no-good-billable-hour.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2334" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/academics/default.aspx">academics</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+issues/default.aspx">gender issues</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/workplace+equity/default.aspx">workplace equity</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/law+firms/default.aspx">law firms</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/billable+hours/default.aspx">billable hours</category></item><item><title>To Quote Margaret Spellings ... </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/23/to-quote-margaret-spellings.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:80</guid><dc:creator>Melinda Henneberger</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/80.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=80</wfw:commentRss><description>The good news in the study Meghan writes about is that both men and women reported feeling more comfortable in professional groups that included more women. Does this mean that men, too, find predominantly male groups more intimidating? Or less interesting?...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/23/to-quote-margaret-spellings.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=80" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/women/default.aspx">women</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/feminism/default.aspx">feminism</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/academics/default.aspx">academics</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/gender+issues/default.aspx">gender issues</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/women+and+science/default.aspx">women and science</category></item><item><title>Re: Re: Speaking of XX, again </title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/17/re-re-speaking-of-xx-again.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:59</guid><dc:creator>Meghan O'Rourke</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/59.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=59</wfw:commentRss><description>I agree that it’s foolish for UC Davis to rescind its invitation to Summers to speak—even if his comments were foolish and ill-informed , as I argued two years ago. But the problem with Christina Hoff Sommers’ piece—and the reason I don’t find it all...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/17/re-re-speaking-of-xx-again.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=59" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/parenting/default.aspx">parenting</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/academics/default.aspx">academics</category></item><item><title>Re: Speaking of XX, again</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/16/re-speaking-of-xx-again.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:58</guid><dc:creator>Anne Applebaum</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/58.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=58</wfw:commentRss><description>But surely this was Sommers' point: How will we ever be able to talk about sex differences in an interesting way if we're not allowed to study them? If the subject is an academic taboo, then the same old cliches will just live on for another generation....(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/16/re-speaking-of-xx-again.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=58" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/parenting/default.aspx">parenting</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/academics/default.aspx">academics</category></item><item><title>Re: Speaking of xx</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/16/re-speaking-of-xx.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:57</guid><dc:creator>Emily Bazelon</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/57.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=57</wfw:commentRss><description>Yes, Larry Summers should be able to speak at Davis. He's done his time (and lost his job). But I'm not ready to says he's a hero for telling it like it is about women and the sciences, which is what Sommers implies. During the fracas over his remarks...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/16/re-speaking-of-xx.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=57" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/parenting/default.aspx">parenting</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/academics/default.aspx">academics</category></item><item><title>Speaking of XX</title><link>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/16/speaking-of-xx.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b38b617e-fbf1-4816-b2a6-f11ec83af8cb:56</guid><dc:creator>Emily Yoffe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/comments/56.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/commentrss.aspx?PostID=56</wfw:commentRss><description>Christina Hoff Sommers has an interesting op-ed in the WSJ today about the academic struggles ignited over former Harvard President Larry Summers remarks about why women are not better represented in the hard sciences. On one hand an invitation for Summers...(&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/2007/10/16/speaking-of-xx.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.slate.com/blogs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=56" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/parenting/default.aspx">parenting</category><category domain="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/xxfactor/archive/tags/academics/default.aspx">academics</category></item></channel></rss>